Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51384 (AP)

Shaik Ameena Bee, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/7591/2021 · 2025-10-05

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010133342021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 7591/2021 Between: 1. SHAIK AMEENA BEE,, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS W/O. SK.IQBAL HUSSAIN, R/O.D.NO.3/320, NAYAK SAHEB STREET, KADAPA, Y.S.R.KADAPA DISTRICT. 2. SHAIK AHAMADUNNISA, , AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, W/O.SK.MOULANA BASHA, R/O.D.NO.3/320, NAYAK SAHEB STREET, KADAPA, Y.S.R.KADAPA DISTRICT. 3. SHAIK RAHAMTHUNNISA,, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, W/O.SK.SIDDIQ, R/O.D.NO.3/320, NAYAK SAHEB STREET, KADAPA, Y.S.R.KADAPA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KADAPA, Y.S.R.KADAPA DISTRICT. 3. THE SUBDIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER / THE DY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KADAPA DIVISION, Y.S.R.KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, I TOWN POLICE STATION, KADAPA, Y.S.R.KADAPA DISTRICT. 5. THE INSPECTOR AUDITOR, A.P.S.WAKF BOARD, COLLECTORATE, E-BLOCK, KADAPA, Y.S.R.KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. G RAMACHANDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. MOHAMMED GAYASUDDIN The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: 2 “.... to issue a Writ, Order or Direction particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with the re-construction / renovation of the petitioners house bearing Nos.4/762, 4/762- land 4/763 which exist in 130.77sq yards in Sy.No.18/1, situated at Sivalingampillai Street, Nagarajupalli, Kadapa which is done in accordance with the building permission by declaring the high handed action of the respondents in interfering with the construction of the petitioners in their land without any basis and following due process of law as illegal and arbitrary.” 2. Heard Sri G.Ramachandra Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, would submit that the police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties. 4. Recording the said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, it is open to both the parties to work out their remedies before appropriate forum in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:06.10.2025 ASR 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.7591 of 2021 Dt.06.10.2025 Asr