- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35483 WP No. 26762 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 26762 OF 2025 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN: 1. SRI ARUN CHANNAKRISHNAIAH S/O CHANNAKRISHNAIAN T.C AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS CURRENTLY RESIDING AT 7568 BRYCE CANYON DR FRISCO, TEXAS TX 75035 REPRESEBTED BYHIS POA HOLDER SRI CHANNAKRISHANIAN T.C 2. SRI CHANNAKRISHANAIAH T.C SON OF CHANAPPA AGE ABOUT 79 YEARS R/AT 166 5TH C MAIN ROAD 7THCROSS HAMPINAGAR VIJAYNAGAR II STAGE BENGALURU560040 (SENIOR CITIZEN BENIFIT NOT CLAIMED) &PETITIONERS (BY SRI. S. SREEVATSA, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SRI. T N VISWANATHA., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35483 WP No. 26762 of 2025 AND: 1. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE BANGALORE METROPOLITAN TASKK FORCE BBMP OFFICE BUILDING N.R.SQUARE BANGALORE 560002 THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOME BANGALORE - 560 001 &RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. K. P. YASHODHA, AGA) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH POLICE NOTICE DTD. 25.08.2025 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT POLICE AT ANNX-A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35483 WP No. 26762 of 2025 ORAL ORDER The first petitioner is the owner of property in No. 315, 6th Cross, 1st B Main Road, 9th Block, 2nd Phase, Nagarbhavi, Vinayaka Layout, Bengaluru [the subject property]. The petitioners are aggrieved by the notice dated 25.08.2025 [Annexure - A] issued by the first respondent, and this respondent has issued this notice calling upon the petitioner to produce documents to verify that the construction is in accordance with the plan. Mr. S. Sreevatsa, the learned Senior counsel for the petitioner, submits that though the notice was issued no proceedings have been conducted on 02.09.2025 and that this Court may dispose of the petition observing that the petitioner is at liberty to produce documents with the first respondent. The learned Senior counsel also submits that if there are - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35483 WP No. 26762 of 2025 pending proceedings, the first respondent must take action subject to the outcome in such proceedings. Mrs. K. P. Yashodha, the learned Additional Government Advocate for the respondents, is heard and this Court disposes of this petition with liberty to the petitioner to respond to notice and without prejudice to prosecute any pending proceedings or proceedings that may be contemplated under Section 248 of the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike Act, 2020. SD/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE RB