M/S RADHA MERCANTILE LTD., v. MANGALURU CITY CORPORATION
CRP/38/2023 · 2025-11-24
V Srishananda
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51372 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51372 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48698 CRP No. 38 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 38 OF 2023 BETWEEN:
M/S. RADHA MERCANTILE LTD., A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE INDIAN COMPANIES ACT, 1956 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE SITUATED AT 'ARJUN', 4th FLOOR, KALYAN GRAMA SOCIETY V.P ROAD, ANDHERI (WEST) MUMBAI - 400 058 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR MR. JAYAPRAKASH S. SHETTY, S/O MR. SUNDARA SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, RESIDING AT "MATHASHREE" BINDA NAGAR, KUNTALAPADY, KARNTAKA TALUK UDUPI DISTRICT - 574 110. &PETITIONER (BY SRI. DINESH RAO N, ADVOCATE) AND:
MANGALURU CITY CORPORATION LALBAGH, MANGALURU - 575 003, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER &RESPONDENT (BY SRI. YESHWANTH NETHAJI, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. K.V. NARASIMHAN, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48698 CRP No. 38 of 2023
THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC, AGAINST THE
ORDER DATED 02.01.2023 PASSED IN MISC.APPEAL NO.12/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, D.K.MANGALURU, DISMISSING THE APPEAL FILED UNDER SECTION 443 A OF THE KARNATAKA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ACT, 1976.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the revision petitioner has filed a memo for withdrawal. The memo reads as under:
"Counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of this Hon9ble Court to withdraw the above revision petition with liberty to file appropriate writ petition. Further prays for extension of interim
order till filing of writ petition.=
Placing the memo on record, revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48698 CRP No. 38 of 2023
Time spent before this Court shall be excluded while computing the delay and latches.
Revision petitioner shall have the benefit of interim
order for a period of two weeks. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE KAV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 40