APHC010685602025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] MONDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 35526/2025 Between: 1. POTHULA VEERA KRISHNA RAO, S/O. VEERANNA, AGED ABOUT 83 YEARS, MALE, R/O. TIRUGUDUMETTA VILLAGE, THALLAPUDI MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.PINCODE 522238 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THALLAPUDI MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.PINCODE 534340 3. THE TAHSILDAR, THALLAPUDI MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT PINCEDE 534340 4. GAJULA BRAHMMANANDAM, S/O. VEERAYYA, MALE, R/O. TIRUGUDUMETTA VILLAGE, THALLAPUDI MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. PINCODE 534340 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or a direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the official respondents in not mutating my name and my sons name in the online 2 DR,J W.P.No.35526 of 2025 webland register with regard to land in an extent of Ac.2.97 cents in R.S.No. 186/3 and Ac.0.49 cents in R.S.No.210/3 of Tirugudumetta Village pursuant to my application No.MLPM241205069202, dated 05.12.2024 and not completing the enquiry as per the notice in ROC No. 126/2025/C, dated 08.05.2025 is illegal, irregular, arbitrary, violation of the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 (Act no. 26 of 1971) and Rules framed there under and also offends Articles 14, 21 and 300 A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the official respondents to mutate the petitioner and his sons name with regard to the land in an extent of Ac.2.97 cents in R.S.No.186/3 and Ac.0.49 cents in R.S.No.210/3 of Tirugumetta Village, Thallapudi Mandal and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 3rd respondent to complete the enquiry pursuant to the notice in ROC No. 126/2025/C, dated 08.05.2025 by duly considering the records produced by the petitioner pending disposal of the main writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MANGENA SREE RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 3 DR,J W.P.No.35526 of 2025 The Court made the followingORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking the following relief: “…to issue a writ, order or a direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the official respondents in not mutating my name and my sons’ name in the online webland register with regard to land in an extent of Ac.2.97 cents in R.S.No. 186/3 and Ac.0.49 cents in R.S.No.210/3 of Tirugudumetta Village pursuant to my application No.MLPM241205069202, dated 05.12.2024 and not completing the enquiry as per the notice in ROC No. 126/2025/C, dated 08.05.2025 is illegal, irregular, arbitrary, violation of the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 (Act no. 26 of 1971) and Rules framed there under and also offends Articles 14, 21 and 300 A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the official respondents to mutate the petitioner and his sons name with regard to the land in an extent of Ac.2.97 cents in R.S.No.186/3 and Ac.0.49 cents in R.S.No.210/3 of Tirugumetta Village, Thallapudi Mandal…” 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for respondents. 3. On perusal of the documents, the petitioner has made an application on 05.12.2024 by paying requisite fee for mutation of the revenue records. Accordingly, the respondents issued notice on 08.05.2025, but no action hasbeen taken. Hence, the writ petition. 4. On considering the submissions and on perusal of the record, without going into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents, more particularly, 3rd respondent to consider the case of the petitioner based on the records and pass appropriate orders in accordance 4 DR,J W.P.No.35526 of 2025 with law within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH Date: 22.12.2025 Dvs 5 DR,J W.P.No.35526 of 2025 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH 230 WRIT PETITION No.35526 of 2025 Dated: 22.12.2025 Dvs