Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51360 (KAR)

SRI RAVINDRA B. JAYAGONDE v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/18081/2025 · 2025-09-09

H T Narendra Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35297 WP No. 18081 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 18081 OF 2025 (S-TR) BETWEEN: SRI RAVINDRA B. JAYAGONDE S/O.LATE BABU AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS PRESENTLY WORKING AS OFFICE MANAGER, CITY MUNICIPAL COUNCIL MADANAYAKANAHALLI. BANGALORE TALUK BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT-562123 &PETITIONER (BY SRI. A. NAGARAJAPPA., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT KARNATAKA GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT VIKASA SOUDHA, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU-560001. 2. THE CITY MUNICIPAL COUNCIL MADANAYAKANAHALLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT-562123 REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. SMT. MOHANKUMARI A.B. AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS PRESENTLY WORKING AS OFFICE MANAGER Digitally signed by HEMALATHA A Location: HIGH COURTOF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35297 WP No. 18081 of 2025 DISTRICT URBAN DEVELOPMENT CELL BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KANDAYA BHAVAN, BENGALURU-560009. &RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.VIKAS R, AGA FOR R1: SRI. A RAVISHANKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2: SRI MITHUN G A, ADVOCATE FOR 3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED: 18.06.2025 IN NO. NA AA E 84 TMC 2025 (BHAGA-3) VIDE ANNEXURE-C ISSUED BY THE R-1 IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONER AND THE R-3 IS CONCERNED AT ITEM NO. 2 OF THE ORDER AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD ORAL ORDER 1. The learned counsel for the respondent No.3 has filed a memo along with copy of the Government Notification dated 22.07.2025 and appointment letter dated 23.07.2025. 2. The memo filed by the respondent No.3 is placed on record. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35297 WP No. 18081 of 2025 3. In view of subsequent event, the prayer sought by the petitioner in this writ petition does not survive for consideration. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. All pending I.As., if any, are disposed of. Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE DM LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 2