Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:CGHC:16566 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(S) No. 3348 of 2022 Kanti Kumar Lonhare S/o Late Shri Sudarshan, Aged About 53 Years R/o Village Paragaon Gariyaband, Tahsil And, District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Panchayat, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Commissioner, Mahatma Gandhi Narega, Atal Nagar, Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Collector, Gariyaband, District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh 4 - Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Gariyaband, District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh 5 - Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Devbhog, District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh Respondents For Petitioner : Shri Rakesh Kumar Manikpuri, Advocate. For Respondent /State : Ms. Shailja Shukla, Dy. G.A. For Respondent : Shri Animesh Pathak, Advocate appeared on behalf of Shri Amrito Das, Advocate for the respondent No.5. Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput Order on Board 12/11/2025
1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking for the following relief : (i) That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ/ direction to the respondent authorities to consider pending representation and reinstate the petitioner in his service within stipulated time with all consequential benefit w.e.f. date of suspension as service law, in the interest of justice. ASHISH TIWARI Digitally signed by ASHISH TIWARI Date: 2025.11.13 14:45:55 +0530
-2- (ii) Any other relief which may be suitable in the facts and circumstances of the case, may also be granted. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for the grievances project in the writ petition, he has made various representations to various authorities of State but till date the same has not been decided and seeks permission from this Court to decide the same as earliest. 3. Not opposed by the respondents. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and peruse the record. 5. Be that as it may, apart from the representations submitted by the petitioner, he is permitted to make a fresh representation to respondent No.5 within 45 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. On such representation having been made, the respondents No. 5 shall decide the same within further period of 120 days from the date of receipt of representation in accordance with law. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed anything on the merits of the case. 6.
With these observation and direction, this writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- Sd/- Sd/- (Sachin Singh Rajput) Judge Ashish