APHC010777512018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] MONDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 37900/2018 Between: 1. SMT.PRANATHI DEV, W/O LATE JUJUSTU KUMAR DEV, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O RAJ STREET, TEKKALI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT. AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. VIAJAYWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICE, TEKKALI P.S, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 6. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TEKKALI P.S, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ Of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents No. 2 to 4 taking legal action against the respondents No. 5 and 6 pursuant to the representation of the petitioner dt.17-09-2018 as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, Violation of the Article 14, 19 (g), 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and also violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents No. 2 to 4 to take legal action against the respondents No. 5 and 6 pursuant to the petitioner's representation Dt.17-09-2018 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents No. 2 to 4 to forthwith to take legal action on the representation of the petitioner DT.17- 09- 2018, pending disposal of writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. TOTA TEJESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.37900 OF 2018 ORDER: Sri Tota Tejeswara Rao, learned counsel for the writ petitioner would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication, and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 24.11.2025 Pmk 4 13 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:37900 OF 2018 Date: 24.11.2025 Pmk