1 2025:CGHC:51022 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 11798 of 2025 • Tameshwar Kumar Nag S/o Shri Late Mangal Ram Nag, Aged About 39 Years Presently Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Primary School- Gotapara, Village- Chilhati, Block- Bhanupratappur, District Kanker, R/o Village Kodagaon, Tahsil And District Kanker (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2. Director, Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3. Joint Director, Education Division- Jagdalpur, District Bastar (C.G.) 4. Collector Kanker, District Kanker (C.G.) 5. District Education Officer, Kanker, District Kanker (C.G.) 6. Block Education Officer, Bhanupratappur, District Kanker (C.G.) 7. Block Education Officer, Koilebeda, District Kanker (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shashikant Chauhan, Advocate For State : Mr. Mayur Khandelwal, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 14.10.2025 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner assailing order dated 05.06.2025 passed by respondent No. 5 by which the petitioner has MANISH YADAV Digitally signed by MANISH YADAV Date: 2025.10.15 11:24:27 +0530 2 been held surplus at Government Primary School Gotapara, Block- Bhanupratappur and posted at Government Primary School, P.G. 112, Block- Koyalibeda. The petitioner has also challenged the rationalization policy dated 02.08.2024. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the representation preferred by the petitioner has been rejected by the respondent authorities though he has not served with the copy of the rejection order, but the same has been sent to him through whats app message. He would further submit that the instant petition may kindly be disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to prefer an appeal against the order of rejection before the appellate authority. 3. Prayer is allowed. 4. Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of granting aforesaid liberty in favour of the petitioner. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Manish