DEEP CHAND SON OF LATE SHRI MADURAM v. RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION
CW/1702/2025 · 2025-02-05
Sameer Jain
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5135 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5135 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:5038] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1702/2025 Deep Chand Son Of Late Shri Maduram, Aged About 63 Years, Resident Of Village Chandichana, Post Rewali, Tehsil Behror, District Kotputli-Behror (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus
1. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Parivahan Marg, Jaipur (Raj.) Through Its Managing Director.
2. Executive Director (Traffice), Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Parivahan Marg, Jaipur (Raj.)
3. Chief Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Jaipur Depot, Jaipur (Raj.)
4. Finance Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Jaipur Depot, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahendra Singh Gothwal Mr. Ghanshyam Maharada Mr. Pawan Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Nitin Sinsinwar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order 05/02/2025
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in spite of a legal notice being submitted before the RSRTC, neither the arrears of pension and gratuity are paid to the petitioner, nor any satisfactory reply is tendered by the respondents. It is further submitted that the petitioner is facing severe financial crunch. Further, it is submitted that instant petition can be disposed of with the liberty to file a representation in light of Pawan Meena vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (SBCWP No.
[2025:RJ-JP:5038] (2 of 2) [CW-1702/2025] 1665/2024) and Circular issued by the Chief Secretary for the State of Rajasthan, dated 19.02.2024 (No. i- 10¼1½ izlq-@vuqq-&1@2012). Heard. Issue notice. On directions of the Court, Mr. Nitin Sinsinwar accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. The consensus has been drawn between the respective sides that the representation/legal notice dated 14.03.2024 will be adjudicated, pronto. This Court directs respondents/competent authority to consider the representation of the petitioner, if filed, and decide the same, strictly in accordance with law, expeditiously as per the ratio encapsulated in Pawan Meena (Supra) and Circular dated
19.02.2024. In light of the aforestated, the present petition is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty being granted. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J ANIL SHARMA /342