Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51349 (AP)

S SRIKANTH REDDY v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/21647/2023 · 2025-12-08

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010416522023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 21647/2023 Between: 1. S SRIKANTH REDDY, S/O. S.N REDDY, AGED 48 YEARS, R/O D.NO.4/175, PAKKEERPALLI, CHINNA CHOWK, KADAPA, Y.S.R DISTRICT. 2. S. LAKSHMIDEVI, W/O. S. SRIKANTH REDDY, AGED 46 YEARS, R/O D.NO.4/175, PAKKEERPALLI, CHINNA CHOWK, KADAPA, Y.S.R DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, YSR KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 3. THE SUBDIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, PULIVENDULA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PULIVENDULA URBAN POLICE STATION, PULIVENDULA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 5. GANTASALA MALLIKARJUNA SETTY, S/O RADHA KRISHNAIAH, R/O D.NO.3-5-555, PULIVENDULA TOWN AND MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. KOTHARU VIJAYESWARI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.. to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus challenging the action of respondents 4 in calling the petitioners to the Police Station and pressurizing them to settle the civil disputes with respondent No.5 as illegal and arbitrary consequently direct the respondents not to call the petitioners to come to office of respondent No.4 and pass...” 2. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that nothing survives for adjudication in the Writ Petition and the matter has become infructuous. 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 09.12.2025 ASR 3 94 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.21647 of 2023 Dt..09.12.2025 ASR