APHC010042162002 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 25663/2002 Between: 1. B.LEELAVATHI, D/O DEVUDU, LECTURER IN ECONOMICS M.R. COLLEGE FOR WOMEN, VIZIANAGARAM. ...PETITIONER AND 1. GOVT OF A P SECTY H E HYD 3 ORS, REP BY SECRETARY HIGHER EDUCATION, SECRETARIATE, HYDERABAD. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER EDUCATION, GOVT OF A.P., HYDERABAD. 3. THE PRINCIPAL, M.R. COLLEGE FOR WOMEN, VIZIANAGARAM, 4. THE CORRESPONDENT, MANSAS, VIZIANAGARAM ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the action of the respondent authorities in not regularising the services of the petitioner as Economics Lecturer in the 3rd respondent institution as arbitary, illegal, null and void and is against the principal of natural justice and norms of the public policy and consequently direct the respondent authorities to regularise the services of the petitioner as Economics Lecturer in the 3rd respondent institution with all consequential benefits and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2002(WPMP 32414 OF 2002 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to continue the services of the petitioner as Economics Lecturer in the 3rd respondent institution without there being any artificial breaks pending disposal of the above writ petition IA NO: 1 OF 2003(WVMP 2731 OF 2003 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders made in W.P.M.P.No. 32414/2002 in W.P.25663 of 2003 dt.30-12-2002 IA NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP 109932 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VENKATESWARA RAO GUDAPATI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION 2. M VIDYAVATHI The Court made the following: ORDER: Sri Venkateswara Rao Gudapati, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the petitioner has not been in contact with him for a long time. As such, they have no instructions as to whether anything survives in the writ petition or not. 2. Since the matter pertains to the year 2002 and the petitioner has not been pursuing the case through his advocate, it shows that the petitioner has no interest in prosecuting the matter. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. However, if the petitioner feels that the cause still survives, he can file appropriate application within a period of two (02) months. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 07.08.2025 JLV