1 2025:CGHC:55155 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 449 of 2023 Govardhan Kashyap, S/o. Sukhram Kashyap, Aged About 28 Years, R/o. Khokhra Naharpara, Police Station Janjgir -Champa, District - Janjgir-Champa (Chhattisgarh) Presently Residing At Torwa, Police Station Torwa, District - Bilsapur (Chhattisgarh) ... Appellant versus 1 - Bablu Singh, Son Of Late Krishna Singh, Aged About 38 Years, R/o. Arna, Thana - Masaran, District - Chapra, (Bihar) (Driver Of Vehicle No. CG.10-AC.3868) 2 - Deepak Tiwari, Son Of Chandrakeshav Tiwari, Aged About 29 Years, R/o. Parijat Kaithal, Phase-2, Police Station Civil Lines, Tehsil And District - Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) (Owner Of Vehcile No. CG.10-AC. 3868) 3 - Branch/divisional Manager, The New India Insurance Company Limited, Branch Office - Rama Trade Centre, Second Floor, In Front Of Rajiv Plaza, Old Bus Stand, Tehsil And District - Bilsapur (Chhattisgarh) (Insurer Of Vehicle No. CG.10-AC.3868) ... Respondents ASHOK SAHU Digitally signed by ASHOK SAHU Date: 2025.11.13 14:04:31 +0530 2 For Appellant : Mr. Tapan K. Chandra, Advocate For Respondent No. 1 & 2 : Mr. Ritesh Verma, Advocate For Respondent No.3 : Ms. Swati Agrawal, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate (Single Bench) Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Judgment on Board 12.11.2025 1. This appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 has been preferred by the appellant/ claimant seeking enhancement of the amount of compensation, challenging the impugned award dated 10.12.2022 passed by learned Eighth Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bilaspur, in Claim Case No.71/2021, by which the claim application of the claimant has been allowed and an amount of Rs.1,07,799/- has been awarded as compensation to the claimant along- with interest @ 9% per annum from the date of filing of claim application for the injuries sustained by the appellant. 2. Mr. Tapan K. Chandra, learned counsel for the appellant/ claimant would submit that the amount of compensation as awarded by the learned Claims Tribunal is not just & proper, which may be suitably enhanced. 3 3. Mr. Ritesh Verma, learned counsel for the respondents No.1 & 2 and Ms. Swati Agrawal, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.3/ insurance company would submit that the amount of compensation awarded by the learned Claims Tribunal is just & proper, which does not call for any interference. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties, considered their rival submissions made herein-above and gone through the records minutely. 5. Learned Claims Tribunal has awarded an amount of Rs.10,000/- for attendant, Rs. 5,000/- for transportation, Rs. 5000/- for nutritious diet, Rs. 10,000/- for mental & physical agony and Rs. 77,799/- for treatment, which, in my considered opinion, is just & proper. As such, I do not find any merit in this appeal, the same is liable to be and hereby dismissed. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Ashok