APHC010637472025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA I.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2025 IN/AND CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 12639/2025 Between: 1. VAINDAM VENKATESH, S/O. RAMANARAO, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS,R/O. KOTHAVEEDHI, BODDAM VILLAGE,RAJ AM MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT 2. VAINDAM RAMANARAO, S/O. LATE APPALASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,R/O. KOTHAVEEDHI, BODDAM VILLAGE,RAJ AM MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT 3. VAINDAM SAVITRI, W/O. RAMANARAO, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,R/O. KOTHAVEEDHI, BODDAM VILLAGE,RAJ AM MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 4. VAINDAM SUNEETHA ALIAS ASAPU SUNEETHA, W/O. RAVI KIRAN, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,R/O. KOTHAVEEDHI, BODDAM VILLAGE,RAJ AM MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 5. ALLADA VENKATA RAMANA ALIAS RAMANA, S/O. SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,R/O. KOTHAVEEDHI, BODDAM VILLAGE,RAJAM MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF AMARAVATHI. 2. VAINDAM JAGADESWARI, W/O. VENKATESH, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS,KANCHARAM VILLAGE, RAJ AM MANDAL,VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1. KOMARASETTY PURNA CHANDRA SAI 2 2. PURNA CHANDRA SAI K Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. YARRAMSETTY VENKATESH 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER: The instant petition under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) has been filed by the Petitioners / Accused Nos.1 to 5, seeking to quash the proceedings against them in C.C.No.231 of 2025 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Rajam. 2. I.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2025 are filed by Respondent No.2 seeking permission to compound the offences and to record the compromise between her and the Petitioners. 3. Petitioners/A1 to A5 and Respondent No.2 appeared before this Court and were identified by their respective learned counsel. Copies of their Aadhar cards attested by their respective counsel are filed for proper identification. 4. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor is in attendance. 5. Both parties would submit that they came to an amicable settlement at the intervention of their elders and well wishers. Learned counsel for the petitioners prays to allow the petition by exercising the inherent jurisdiction under Section 528 of BNSS. 3 6. Considering the submissions, in the light of the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab and another1, since there is an amicable settlement between them, I.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2025 are allowed. Consequently, the Criminal Petition is allowed and the case against the Petitioners / Accused Nos.1 to 5 in C.C.No.231 of 2025 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Rajam, is hereby quashed. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:22.12.2025 Asr 1 2012(10)SCC 303 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA I.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2025 IN/AND CRIMINAL PETITION No.12639 of 2025 Dt.22.12.2025 Asr