Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51322 (KAR)

NANJAMMANI v. SMT JAYALAKSHMAMMA

RSA/40/2020 · 2025-09-09

V Srishananda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35664 RSA No. 40 of 2020 C/W RSA No. 3 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 40 OF 2020 C/W REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 3 OF 2020 IN RSA No. 40/2020 BETWEEN: 1. SMT.NANJAMMANI W/O LATE K JAYARAMU @ K JAYARAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, 2. J CHAITHRA D/O LATE K JAYARAMU @ K JAYARAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, 3. J KISHORE S/O LATE K JAYARAMU @ JAYARAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, 4. J SHRUTHI D/O LATE K JAYARAMU @ JAYARAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, 5. J RANI D/O LATE K JAYARAMU @ JAYARAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, 6. J SHWETHA D/O LATE K JAYARAMU @ K JAYARAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, (DELETED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 31.03.2021 AND TRANSPOSED AS RESPONDENT NO.9) Digitally signed by R MANJUNATHA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35664 RSA No. 40 of 2020 C/W RSA No. 3 of 2020 ALL ARE RESIDING AT MALLINATHAPURA VILLAGE, MALAVALLI TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT-571430 &APPELLANTS (BY SRI PANCHAM R D, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT JAYALAKSHMAMMA W/O K JAYARAMU @ JAYARAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/AT KOMMERAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, MANDYA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT-571401 2. K J NAGESH S/O K JAYARAMU @ K JAYARAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, 3. KUM K J BHAVYASHREE D/O K JAYARAMU @ K JAYARAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, THE RESPONDENT NO.2 AND 3 ARE R/AT KOMMERAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, MANDYA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT-571 401 4. THE DIRECTOR HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DIRECTORATE, ANANDA RAO CIRCLE BANGALORE-560009 5. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL G.P.F. OFFICE, STONE BUILDING BANGALORE-560001 6. DISTRICT HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE OFFICER M C ROAD, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35664 RSA No. 40 of 2020 C/W RSA No. 3 of 2020 MANDYA DISTRICT-571401 7. TALUK HEALTH OFFICER TALUK HEALTH OFFICE MALAVALLI TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT-571 430 8. HEALTH OFFICER PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRE DODDABUVALLI VILLAGE, B G PURA HOBLI MANDYA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT-571401 9. J SHWETHA D/O LATE K JAYARAMU @ K JAYARAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/AT MALLINATHAPURA VILLAGE, MALAVALLI TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT-571430 &RESPONDENTS (BY SRI H.S.RAMAMURTHY, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3; SRI GOPALKRISHNA SOODI, AGA FOR R4 TO R8) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 27.09.2019 PASSED IN R.A.NO.60/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE IV ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MANDYA PARTLY ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND PARTLY SETTING ASIDE AND MODIFYING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 11.01.2019 PASSED IN O.S.NO.105/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, MANDYA - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35664 RSA No. 40 of 2020 C/W RSA No. 3 of 2020 IN RSA NO. 3/2020 BETWEEN: 1. SMT NANJAMMANI W/O LATE K JAYARAMU @ K JAYARAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS 2. J.SHWETHA D/O LATE K JAYARAMU ALIAS K JAYARAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS 3. J CHAITHRA D/O LATE K JAYARAMU ALIAS K JAYARAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS 4. J KISHORE S/O LATE K JAYARAMU ALIAS K JAYARAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS 5. J SHRUTHI D/O LATE K JAYARAMU ALIAS K JAYARAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS 6. J RANI D/O LATE K JAYARAMU ALIAS JAYARAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS ALL ARE R/AT MALLINATHAPURA VILLAGE MALAVALLI TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT-571430 ...APPELLANTS (BY SRI PANCHAM R D, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT JAYALAKSHMAMMA W/O K JAYARAMU ALIAS JAYARAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS R/AT KOMMERAHALLI VILLAGE - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35664 RSA No. 40 of 2020 C/W RSA No. 3 of 2020 KASABA HOBLI, MANDYA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT-571401 2. K J NAGESH S/O K JAYARAMU ALIAS K JAYARAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS 3. KUM K J BHAVYASHREE D/O K JAYARAMU ALIAS K JAYARAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS THE RESPONDENT NOS.2 AND 3 ARE R/AT KOMMERAHALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, MANDYA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT-571401 4. THE DIRECTOR, HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DIRECTORATE ANANDA RAO CIRCLE BANGALORE-560 009 5. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL GPF OFFICE STONE BUILDING BANGALORE-560001 6. DISTRICT HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE OFFICER M C ROAD MANDYA DISTRICT-571401 7. TALUK HEALTH OFFICER TALUK HEALTH OFFICE MALAVALLI TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT-571430 8. HEALTH OFFICER PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRE DODDABUVALLI VILLAGE B G PURA HOBLI MANDYA TALUK - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35664 RSA No. 40 of 2020 C/W RSA No. 3 of 2020 MANDYA DISTRICT-571401 ...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI RAMAMURTHY H S, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3; SRI GOPALKRISHNA SOODI, ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 27.09.2019 PASSED IN RA NO.18/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE IV ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MANDYA PARTLY ALLOWING THE APPEAL, PARTLY SETTING ASIDE AND MODIFYING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 11.01.2019 PASSED IN OS NO.105/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM., AT MANDYA. THESE APPEALS, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Parties are present with their respective advocates. Sri Gopalkrishna Soodi, learned Additional Government Advocate is present. - 7 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35664 RSA No. 40 of 2020 C/W RSA No. 3 of 2020 2. Compromise petition under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the code of Civil Procedure signed by the parties and their respective Advocates is filed in RSA No.3/2020. 3. Contents of the compromise petition are read over to the parties in Kannada language and they admit that the terms of the compromise petition depict the true terms of settlement. 4. Further they submit that there is no force or undue influence or coercion in reaching out the terms of the compromise. 5. As such, there is no impediment for this Court to accept the terms of the compromise petition in RSA No.3/2020 and dispose of the said appeal in terms of the compromise petition. 6. Memo in RSA No.40/2020 is filed. It is submitted in the memo that in view of the compromise reported in RSA No.3/2020, RSA No.40/2020 may be disposed of. Accordingly, the following: ORDER (i) Appeal in RSA No.3/2020 stands disposed of in terms of the compromise petition. - 8 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35664 RSA No. 40 of 2020 C/W RSA No. 3 of 2020 (ii) Office is directed to pass the modified decree in RSA No.3/2020 in terms of the compromise petition appending copy of the compromise petition as part of the decree. (iii) In view of the settlement reported in RSA No.3/2020, RSA No.40/2020 stands disposed of as rendered infructous. (iv) No order as to costs. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE MR