APHC010217462016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 17492/2016 Between: 1. SRINIVAS INDUSTRIES, REP. BY ITS DGM/ (WD) I/C, G.V.V. SATYANARAYANA, S/O LATE TIRUPATAIAH, AGED 49 YEARS, AT 3-208, ROAD NO.1, GANGA RAJU NAGAR, VALASAPAKALA, KAKINADA - 533 001. ...PETITIONER AND 1. PRL SECY GAD HYD VIGILANCE DEPT, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SE RSETARY TO OVEMENT, VIGILANCE DEPARTMENT, 47A-7 SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. THE CHAIRMAN MANAGING DIRECTOR, RINL VISHAKAPATNAM STEEL RANT, VISHAKAPATNAM. 3. THE DIRECTOR PERSONNEL, VISHAKAPATNAM. 4. THE CENTRAL VIGILANCE COMMISSIONER, G.P.O -INA, NEW DELHI. 5. THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER, WORKS CONTRACT I/C, RASTRIA ISPAT NIGAM LTD, (A GOVT. INDIA UNDER TAKING) VISHAKAPATNAM STEEL PLANT, VISHAKAPATNAM. 6. THE ASST GENERAL MANAGER WCD, RASTRIA ISPAT NIGAM LTD, (A GOVT. INDIA UNDER TAKING) VISHAKAPATNAM STEEL PLANT, VISHAKAPATNAM -530031. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 JS,J W.P.No.17492/2016 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned proceedings in reference VSP/WK/WC/16/584 Dt:19-04-2016 issued by the 5th respondent herein as illegal , arbitrary, malafide, unconstitutional, irrational, biased, contrary to the special conditions of the contract in the tender document, violative of article 14, 16, 21 of the constitution of India and to consequently set aside the same and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 21498 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 2 OF 2016(WPMP 21499 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to restrain the 4th and 5th respondents herein from awarding the work tendered by the petitioner herein response to the open tender notice number 75830.0 limiting to the quantities in BOQ tender in favour of the third parties, pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S MADHAVA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. K SARVA BHOUMA RAO 2. KIRAN KUMAR VADLAMUDI 3. GP FOR GENERAL ADMINISTRATION (AP) 3 JS,J W.P.No.17492/2016 The Court made the following ORDER: No representation for the petitioner. Though the matter was adjourned on 06.10.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos.2 to 6 submits that a separate writ petition was filed questioning the proceedings in debarring the petitioner firm from participating in the tender process. Since the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 13.10.2025 KAS 4 JS,J W.P.No.17492/2016 119 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 17492/2016 Dated: 13.10.2025 KAS