2025:JHHC:14070 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No.385 of 2025 ----- 1. Syed Perwaze Asrar, S/o Late Asrar Ahmad Nadvi, R/o Flat No. UGD, AI Rayan Enclave, Sattar Colony, P.O. & P.S.-Bariatu, District-Ranchi 2. Lallan Prasad Singh, S/o Late Chedi Singh, R/o Canarihel, P.O. & P.S.-Hazaribagh, District-Hazaribagh 3. Kapil Deo Prasad, S/o Late Rameshwar Prasad, R/o UG- 01, Kaveri-1, Trivenipuram, P.O. & P.S.-Dugadaga, District-Ranchi .......... Petitioners. -Versus- 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Pradeep Sharma, Deputy General Manager, Jharkhand Urja Utpaadan Nigam Limited, Dhurwa, Ranchi .......... Opp. Parties. ----- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioners : Mr. Prabhat Singh, Advocate For the State : Ms. Varsha Ramsisaria, AC to GP-V For the JUVNL : Mr. Kaushik Sarkhel, Advocate ----- Order No.05 Date: 09.05.2025 1. The present contempt case has been filed for initiation of contempt proceeding against the opposite party no.2 alleging wilful violation of the interim order dated 11.01.2024 passed in W.P. (S) No. 7097 of 2023. 2. Mr. Kaushik Sarkhel, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party no.2, refers to the corrigendum as contained in memo no.223, dated 24.04.2025 (Annexure- D series to the show cause affidavit dated 06.05.2025) and submits that earlier the office letters all dated 30.07.2024 inadvertently issued have subsequently been recalled/cancelled. The opposite party no.2 has also sought unqualified apology for issuing the letters dated 30.07.2024 which were in violation of the interim order 2025:JHHC:14070 2 dated 11.01.2024. Since the letters dated 30.07.2024 have already been recalled, the opposite party no.2 may be pardoned. 3. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering that subsequently the opposite party no.2 has recalled earlier letters dated 30.07.2024 which were in violation of the interim order dated 11.01.2024, unqualified apology prayed by the opposite party no.2 in its show cause affidavit is accepted. 4. The contempt proceeding as against the opposite party no.2 is hereby dropped. 5. The present contempt case stands disposed of. (Rajesh Shankar, J.) Vikas/