Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51313 (AP)

K. Venkat Raman, S/o Lakshmi Narayana, v. The A.P. Zenco., Rep. by its M.D.,

WP/10515/2013 · 2025-11-06

Subba Reddy Satti

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010749542013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] FRIDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 10515/2013 Between: 1. K. VENKAT RAMAN, S/O LAKSHMI NARAYANA,, OCC:- CONTRACT EMPLOYEE, RIO H. NO. 5-155, VUYYURU, KRISHNA DIST., ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE A P ZENCO REP BY ITS M D, VIDYUTH SOUDHA, KHAIRATABAD, HYDERABAD. 2. THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER FIR, A.P. ZENCO, VIDYUTH SOUDHA, KHAIRATABAD, HYDERABAD. 3. THE DIRECTOR HR A P ZENCO, VIDYUTH SOUDHA, KHAIRATABAD, HYDERABAD. 4. THE CHIEF ENGINEER VTPS IBRAHIMPATNAM KRISHNA DISTRICT, - ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in denying 5 marks to the Petitioner under the heads given in the Recruitment Notification of Junior Plant Attendants dated 05-1-2011 read with addendum dated 29-01-2011 and supplemental notification dated 17-10-2011 as is illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and the same is violative of Recruitment notification and consequently direct the Respondents to add 5 marks and permit the Petitioner to appear for TRADE TEST scheduled on 13-04-2013 IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 13049 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to permit the Petitioner to appear for TRADE TEST scheduled on 13-04-2013 for the post of Junior Plant Attendants which are going to be filled by the Respondents in pursuance to Notification dated 5-1- 2011 read with addendum dated 29-01-2011 and supplemental notification dated 17-10-2011 IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WVMP 1531 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Vacate the orders Dated 09/04/2013 in W.P.M.P.No. 13049 of 2013 in W.P.No.10515 of 2013 in the interest of justice Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P S P SURESH KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. V SESHA KUMARI 2. The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: Sri P. Praveen, learned counsel representing Sri P.S.P. Suresh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the writ petition has become infructuous. 2. Given the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 07.11.2025 TVN 45 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION No.10515 OF 2013 Date: 07.11.2025 TVN