Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5131 (HP)

GURMEET SINGH v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

EX.P./42/2025 · 2025-01-20

Bipin Chander Negi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Execution Petition No. 42 of 2025 Decided on: 20.01.2024 ____________________________________________________ Gurmeet Singh ……….. petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others ……….respondents ____________________________________________________ Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi, Vacation Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioner : Mr. Vinay Sharma, Advocate (through video conferencing). For the respondents : Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General. ____________________________________________________ Bipin Chander Negi, Vacation Judge (oral) The present petitioner had filed CWP bearing No. 11790 of 2024 titled as Gurmeet Singh vs. State of H.P. and others. The aforesaid petition had been filed seeking the following two reliefs:- i. That the notification dated 30.07.2024 (Annexure P-1) may kindly be quashed and set aside. ii. That the notification dated 17.08.2024 (Annexure P-2) may kindly be quashed and set aside qua the GPS Ghunghan Kalan. 2. Vide judgment dated 23.10.2024, the aforesaid writ petition bearing No. 11790 of 2024 titled as Gurmeet Singh vs. 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 State of H.P. and others, had been disposed of vide the following order:- “3. It would be noticed that apart from the five students, that occur in the Primary Section there are as many as seven other students, who are studying in the pre-primary section. 4. It is for this precise reason that the learned Deputy Advocate General has informed the Court that the decision regarding shifting of GPS Ghunghan Kalan to GPS Kakrana is being reconsidered. 5. Once that be so, obviously the instant petition has served its purpose and is disposed of accordingly, so also the pending application(s), if any.” 3. The present execution petition No. 42 of 2025 has been filed seeking execution/implementation of judgment dated 23.10.2024 (Annexure E-1). In the judgment dated 23.10.2024 especially in Para 4, it had been noticed that the matter is being re-considered. 4. Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record instructions dated 15.01.2025. The same are taken on record. Copy whereof has been supplied to learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. Appended thereto is an order dated 3rd January, 2025, which has been passed upon re- consideration. 5. In view thereof, nothing survives for the adjudication in the present lis. The present petition is disposed of alongwith pending miscellaneous applications, if any. The petitioner is at liberty to assail order dated 3rd January, 2025 passed in 3 pursuance to judgment dated 23.10.2024 passed in CWP No. 13790 of 2024. (Bipin Chander Negi) Vacation Judge January 20, 2025 tarun