APHC010593592025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] FRIDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 30822/2025 Between: 1. CHALLA SRIRAMULU, S/O ROSHANNA, AGED ABOUT ABOVE 67 YEARS, R/O.D.NO. 1-368 CHERLOPALLI VILAGE, BATHALAPALLE MANDAL, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT NW SRI SATYA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 2. 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, DHARMAVARAM DIVISION, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. 3. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, BATHALAPALLE MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. 4. 4. THE MANDAL SURVEYOR, BATHALAPALLE MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. 5. 5. THE VILLAGE SURVEYOR, D. CHERLOPALLI VILLAGE, BATHALAPALLE MANDAL,SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. 6. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, BATHALAPALLE MANDAL, SRI SATYA DISTRICT. 7. 7. R VIJAY KUMAR, S/O. VENKATARAMANA NAIDU, MADHURANAGAR, GARLDINE VILLAGE AND MANDAL ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 2 8. R VENKAT PRASAD, S/O. VENKATARAMANA NAIDU, D/O. NO 599 B, SANTHI NIKETHAN LAYOUT, BANNERUKATTA, BANGALORE. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or Order or Direction, particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents nos 3 to 5 to conduct Afresh survey on 31.10.2025 is illegal, arbitrary and violations of Article 14, 21 300A and consequently set a side the same and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No’s.3 to 5 to submit the survey report which was conducted on 19.09.2025 and to suspend the operation of notice issued by the revenue authorities on 31.10.2025 for conducting a fresh survey and demarcating of boundaries on 07.11.2025 in respect of Sy.No 132 situated at D.Cherlopalli Vilage, Bathalapalle Mandal, Ananthapur District Now Sri Satya District pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit Challa Sreeramulu to implead respondent no 9 as proposed respondent as a party respondent no 9 in WP. No. 30822 OF 2025, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 30822 of 2025 ORDER: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of the India seeking the following relief:- “to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent Nos.3 to 5 to conduct afresh survey on 31.10.2025 as illegal”. 2. The contention of the petitioner is that, earlier, based on the application filed by the petitioner and others, the respondent authorities have not conducted survey as per the rules, hence, they constrained to file a writ petition W.P.No.16995 of 2025, the said Writ Petition was disposed of vide order dated 23.07.2025 directing the respondent authorities to conduct survey in an extent of Ac.15.92 cents in Sy.No.132, situated at D.Cherlopalli village, Bathalapalle Mandal. Accordingly, the 2nd respondent issued notice on 12.09.2025 to the petitioner and conducted survey on 19.09.2025. Despite the completion of the said survey and demarcation process, the survey report has not been furnished to the petitioner. Now, surprisingly, again, they have issued notice on 31.10.2025 for conducting fresh survey, which is scheduled to be conducted on 07.11.2025 i.e., today. Aggrieved by the same, the present writ petition has been filed. 4 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that earlier the respondent authorities conducted survey, but they have not chosen to give report/endorsement for the reasons best known to the respondent authorities. Now with a malafide intention, again, they have issued notices to conduct survey. 4. When the second resurvey is scheduled to today, the petitioner may participate in the survey and file his objections and after completion of survey, the respondent authorities ought to have given the survey report/ endorsement to the petitioner. In the said circumstances, if the respondent authorities have conducted the survey, which is scheduled to today, they may complete the survey and if any objections are filed by the petitioner, the same may be considered and issue endorsement to that effect, strictly, within a period of one month. 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall also stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH Dt:07.11.2025 SJ 5 78 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D. RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 30822 of 2025 07.11.2025 ssjj