Govindarajulu Boyina v. The Ministry of Corporate Affairs
WP/44865/2018 · 2025-11-30
Sumathi Jagadam
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51304 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51304 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010928142018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 44865/2018 Between:
1. GOVINDARAJULU BOYINA, S/O RAMANA MURTHY BOYINA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, RESIDENT OF 7-9-70, VYSYA STREET, MAIN ROAD, KOTABOMMALI, SRIKAKULAM ANDHRA PRADESH STATE, INDIA-532195
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA 'A' WING, SHASTRI BHAWAN, RAJENDRA PRASAD ROAD, NEW DELHI, DELHI 110001
2. REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES ANDHRA PRADESH AND TELANGANA, 2NDFLOOR, CORPORATE BHAWAN, GSI POST, TATTIANNARAM NAGOLE, BANDLAGUDA HYDERABAD - 500 068
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue any appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus, A. that the list of directors placed by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) on its website, i.e. www.mca.gov.in, as arbitrary, illegal, without jurisdiction, contrary of the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 and Rule 11 of the Companies (Appointment of Directors) Rules, 2014, violative of the principles of natural justice besides violating the P-1 rights guaranteed under Article 14 and Article 19 (1) (g) of the Constitution of India and set-aside the same to the extent it declares/treats the
2 JS,J W.P.No.44865/2018
Petitioner as disqualified in terms of Section 164 (2) (a) of the Companies Act 2013, in the interest of justice, B. that the Petitioner is not disqualified in terms of Section 164 (2) (a) of the Companies Act, 2013, for the reason of alleged default of non-filing financial statements/Annual Returns in struck of Companies. C. Writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the Respondents to restore the DIN of Petitioner DIN,
00549671. and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to make active the Director Identification Number i.e., DIN, 00549671 of petitioner and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P ANIL MUKHERJI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA
3 JS,J W.P.No.44865/2018
The Court made the following ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner appeared through online and submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 01.12.2025
KAS
4 JS,J W.P.No.44865/2018
210
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 44865/2018
Dated: 01.12.2025 KAS