APHC010237442014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY ,THE THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 24308 OF Between: Besi Sriramulu, The Government Of Andhra Pradesh Rep By Its Principal and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VENKATESWARA RAO GUDAPATI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. P HEMACHANDRA 2. GP-MUNCIPAL ADMN The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 24308 OF 2014 AND The Government Of Andhra Pradesh Rep By Its Principal ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: VENKATESWARA RAO GUDAPATI Counsel for the Respondent(S): P HEMACHANDRA MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3460] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT(S) THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 24308 OF 2014 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief: “…..to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus declaring the proceedings No.2206/2010-02, dated 12.06.2014 of the 3rd respondent in granting permission for erecting the 4S cell tower to the 4th respondent at plot no.110 AND 115 in S.No.51/1 to 51/8 of PVR Colony, Vizianagaram, as arbitrary, illegal, null and void and contrary to G.O.Ms.No.380, dated 01.08.2013 and against the norms of the public policy and the principles of natural justice and unconstitutional and consequently to set aside the proceedings No.2206/2010-02, dated 12.06.2014 issued by the 3rd respondent and pass such other orders....” 2. This Court had passed interim order dated 11.09.2014, where under the Respondent No.4 has undertakes to remove the Cell Tower in Plot No. 115. 3. Learned counsel for the Respondent No.4 would submit that a Memo is filed vide USR No.36630 of 2025, wherein it was mentioned that the Cell Towner in Plot No.115 is removed as per undertaking. 3. Recording the submissions made, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 03.04.2025 KK