APHC010424262008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3397] THURSDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO APPEAL SUIT NO: 600/2008 Between: 1. DEVISETTY KUPPUSWAMY, S/O. LATE PENCHALAIAH R/O. 20/135, RAJAGARI STREET, MULAPET, NELLORE. 2. DEVISETTY SAIPRABHAKAR, S/O. LATE PENCHALAIAH R/O. FLAT NO. 302, DEVI NILAYAM, KONDA BALARAMI STREET, DARGAMITTA, NELLORE. 3. DEVISETTY JAGAN MOHAN RAO, S/O. LATE PENCHALAIAH R/O. XC2-11, PINAKINI NAGAR, SULLURPET, NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. DEVISETTY MADHUSUDHAN RAO, S/O. LATE PENCHALAIAH R/O. 20-1-151, RAJAGARI STREET, MULAPET, NELLORE. 5. DEVISETTY SEKHAR BABU, S/O. LATE PENCHALAIAH R/O. D.NO. 20-1-145, SUBHASH NAGAR, HIB KORLAGUNTA, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 6. DEPURI NAGESHWARI, W/O. LATE VENKATESWARLU R/O. TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 7. UPPU SNEHALATHA, W/O. LATE KOTESWARA RAO R/O. D.NO. 8- 31-24, VUYKUNTAPURAM, KAVALI TOWN, ...APPELLANT(S) AND 1. DEVISETTY LAKSHMINARAYANA, S/O. LATE PENCHALAIAH R/O. UPSTAIRS OF 20/136, RAJAGARI STREET, MULAPET, NELLORE. 2. DEVISETTY RAJENDRA PRASAD, S/O. LATE PENCHALAIAH R/O. GROUND FLOOR OF 20/136, RAJAGARI STREET, MULAPET, NELLORE. ...RESPONDENT(S): IA NO: 1 OF 2008(ASMP 1357 OF 2008 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to alienate the plaint schedule properties, pending disposal of the above appeal and pass Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1. M RAVINDRA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. M V S SURESH KUMAR 2. Y L SIVA KALPANA REDDY THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO APPEAL SUIT No.600 of 2008 JUDGMENT: Learned counsel appearing for both sides is present. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that they filed a Memo before the Registry vide U.S.R.No.36462 of 2022, stating that the appellant No.2 had passed away on 10.09.2025, and no legal representatives have been brought on record. 3. Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the party is not in touch with them and further submitted that necessary orders may be passed. 4. Since the appellants are not prosecuting the appeal and accordingly, the Appeal Suit is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO Date.13.11.2025 CVD