APHC010193682021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 11043/2021 Between: 1. BATTALA PARANDHAMAIAH,, S/O.B.NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O.KATIGANIKALAVA, ANANTAPUR RURAL MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 2. NARA RAMUDU,, S/O.THIPPANNA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O.KATIGANIKALAVA, ANANTAPUR RURAL MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTHAPURAM TOWN, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. A SANKARA REDDY, S/O.KONA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 73YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O.CHINNAPALLI, C.K.MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 4. A VENKATARAMI REDDY, S/O.KONA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 70YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O.CHINNAPALLI, C.K.MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 5. A HANUMANTHA REDDY, S/O.KONA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 68YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O.CHINNAPALLI, C.K.MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 6. A SIVA REDDY, S/O.KONA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 70YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O.CHINNAPALLI, C.K.MANDAL, ANANTAPUR 2 DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of Respondents more particularly Respondent No.2 in interfering with civil dispute by entering into Schedule Property under t influence and instigation of Respondents No.3 to 6 is illegal, against to law, violation of the Article 300-A and consequently direct the Official Respondents to not to interfere with Schedule Property and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to DIRECT the official Respondent not to interfere in Civil Dispute between Petitioners and Un-official Respondents pending disposal of this Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. M KRISHNA CHAITANYA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 11043 of 2021 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of Respondents more particularly Respondent No.2 in interfering with civil dispute by entering into Schedule Property under the influence and instigation of Respondents No.3 to 6 is illegal, against to law, violation of the Article 300-A and consequently direct the Official Respondents to not to interfere with Schedule Property and pass…” 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that in the light of the interim order passed by this Court vide Order dated 15.06.2021, the respondent- police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioners and unofficial respondents. 3. Sri M.Krishna Chaitanya, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 4. In that view of the matter, this Writ Petition is disposed of making the interim order as absolute. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 07.10.2025. VNS 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No. 11043 of 2021 Dated.07.10.2025 VNS 691