Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51291 (AP)

R RADHA KRISHNA MURTHY v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/25544/2025 · 2025-12-07

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010488202025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 25544/2025 Between: 1. R RADHA KRISHNA MURTHY, , S/O.RAJA SUBRAHMANYAM, AGED 63 YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR, R/O.FLAT.NO.303,OPP NAVULURI ENCLAVE, 1ST LINE, PATTABHIPURAM,GUNTUR,GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, PRIME HILL CREST, 4TH FLOOR, NEAR DGP OFFICE, VADDESWARAM VILLAGE, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE VIJAYAWADA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, VIJAYAWADA, N T R DISTRICT. 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, VIJAYAWADA, VIJAYAWADA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION. 5. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION VIJAYAWADA. 6. THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION 2 VIJAYAWADA. 7. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PRATHIWADA VARUN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV 2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING 3. S.V.S.S.SIVARAM SC For VMC The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri Prathiwada Varun Kumar, learned Counsel for the Petitioner, Sri M. Srinu Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for MAUD, Sri Panku Rajesh Kumar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Finance & Planning, Sri K.P. Sailesh Kumar, learned Counsel representing Sri S.V.S.S. Siva Ram, learned Standing Counsel for VMC. 2. The Written Instructions furnished on the last occasion by Respondent Nos.3 to 6 dated 20.09.2025 would indicate that the amounts are admitted and have been uploaded on the CFMS Portal with new Seignorage Policy. 3. Having recorded the above facts, this Court deems it appropriate to allow this Writ Petition by directing all the Respondents including Respondent No.7 to complete the entire administrative process both inter-departmental and intra-departmental by mutual cooperation and coordination within a period of twelve (12) weeks from today and transfer the due amount to the bank account of the Writ Petitioner after ascertaining the Net Amount within four (04) weeks thereafter. 3 4. Writ Petitioner is directed to submit a copy of the bank account details to the Competent Authority within a period of two (02) week from today. 5. With these observations and directions, the Writ Petition stands allowed. No order as to costs. 6. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Date: 08.12.2025 DSV 4 209 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 25544/2025 08.12.2025 DSV 5 HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI MAIN CASE No. WRIT PETITION NO: 25544/2025 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No DATE ORDER Office Note 04. 08.12.2025 GRKP, J Writ Petition is allowed. (vide separate order) ___________ GRKP, J DSV