Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5129 (UTT)

SHEKHAR PAL v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSB/108/2020 · 2025-04-29

Ashish Naithani, Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures WPSB 108/2020 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. Mr. M.C. Pant, Advocate, i/b Mr. D.S. Mehta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Dinesh Bankoti, Brief Holder, for the State. Mr. Rakshit Srivastava, Advocate, i/b Mr. Ramji Srivastava, Advocate for the respondent no. 7. Mr. Devansh Kaushik, Advocate, i/b Mr. Parikshit Saini, Advocate for the respondent no. 8. (2) By means of this writ petition, petitioner has challenged an advertisement issued on 6.5.2020. By the said advertisement, applications were invited for appointment to different faculty positions in different Govt. Medical Colleges in State of Uttarakhand. (3) Since the writ petition was filed in 2020 challenging an advertisement and the selection process must have been concluded by now, therefore, no useful purpose would served by keeping the writ petition pending. (4) Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner had applied for appointment as Professor and no selection could be held for which petitioner had applied. (5) In view of the statement made by learned Counsel for the petitioner, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Ashish Naithani, J.) (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 29.4.2025 Pr