2025:CGHC:16566 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(S) No. 1647 of 2021 1 - Sarita Pandey W/o Shri Ashutosh Pandey Aged About 41 Years Occupation Service, Presently Posted As District Coordinator, C.G. Centre For Enterpreneurship, Development (Cgced) Branch Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Taran Khunte S/o Late Sonu Ram Khunte Aged About 42 Years Occupation Service, Presently Posted As District Coordinator, C.G. Centre For Enterpreneurship Development (Cgced) Branch Korba, District Korba Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh 3 - Mohd. Sabir Khan S/o Mohd. Ibrahim Khan Aged About 56 Years Occupation - Service, Presently Posted As District Coordinator, C.G Centre For Enterpreneurship Development (Cgced) Branch Koriya, District Koriya Chhattisgarh., District : Koriya (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh 4 - Manoj Gautam S/o Late Shri Mahesh Gautam Aged About 48 Years Occupation Service, Presently Posted As District Coordinator, C.G. Centre, For Entrepreneurship Development (Cgced) Branch Jashpur, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh., District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Dharam Nath Tiwari S/o Shri Hari Prasad Tiwari Aged About 36 Years Occupation Service, Presently Posted As District Coordinator, C.G. Centre, For Entrepreneurship Development (Cgced) Branch Raigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 6 - Devendra Kumar Porte S/o Govind Ram Porte Aged About 27 Years Occupation Service, Presently Posted As Office Boy (Cgced) Branch Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Commerce And Industries, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya New Raipur, Atal Nagar District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Union Of India Through The Secretary, Department Of Personnel And Training, North Block, Central Secretariat New Delhi, Delhi 110001., District : New Delhi, Delhi 3 - State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Department Of Commerce And Industries, Vallabh Bhawan, Arera Hills, Bhopal (M.P.)., District : Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh ASHISH TIWARI Digitally signed by ASHISH TIWARI Date: 2025.11.19 11:08:58 +0530 -2- 4 - Center For Enterpreneur Development Of Madhya Pradesh (Cedmap) A Society Registered Under Society Registration Act 1973 Of Erstwhile State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Its Executive Director, 16-A Arera Hills, Bhopal (M.P.)., District : Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh Respondents For Petitioners : Shri Sourabh Sahu, Advocate. For Respondent No.1 /State : Shri Vedant Shadangi, P.L. For Respondent No.2/U.O.I. : Shri Bhupendra Pandey, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput Order on Board 14/10/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking for the following relief : i. That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the Order dated 26/02/2021 Bearing no. CEDMAP/EDS/335, Order dated 05/02/2021, bearing no. CEDMAP/EDS/297, and order dated 05/02/2021 Bearing no. CEDMAP/EDS/ 297, CEDMAP/EDS/300, CEDMAP/ EDS/ 301, CEDMAP/EDS/302 and order dated 06/02/2021, passed by Passed by respondent no.4. ii. That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents to initiate proceedings for division of assets and liabilities of the CEDMAP, and further to constitute the CGCED. iii. That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to further direct the respondents to regularize the petitioners in the service. iv. Cost of the petition may also be granted to the petitioner. v. Any other relief, which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper, may also kindly be granted to the petitioner, in the interest of justice. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioners were working with respondent No. 2 and 3 on contractual employment for the last so many years and suddenly the impugned inter-office correspondence was issued by the respondent No. 2 and 3 which is filed as Annexure P/1 dated 05/02/2021 whereby one month notice for discontinuation of the contract of the petitioner -3- were directed. Challenging, the same this writ petition was filed and this Court vide its order dated 03/03/2021, directed the petitioner to submit a representation which may be sympathetically considered by respondent No. 2 He submits that the till date the representation submitted by the petitioner have not been considered by the respondent No.2 and 3. therefore, he prays making the order dated 03/03/2021 made absolute, this writ petition may be disposed of. 3. Not opposed by the other parties. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and peruse the record. 5. Be that as it may, this Court vide its order dated 03/03/2021 observed that given the said facts, till a final decision is taken by this Court, the petitioners as of now are directed to approach the respondent No. 2 in-respect-of their grievances, more particularly so far as the interim relief that could be provided to them by either retaining them in employment of the respondent No. 2 and giving them posting in the State of Madhya Pradesh or permitting them to continue in services till the State of Chhattisgarh takes a policy decision in-respect-of the centers which were being operated in the State of Chhattisgarh. Let the petitioners in-addition to any representation that they have made, make a fresh representation to the respondent No. 2 who in turn shall consider the same pragmatically, sympathetically and also taking into consideration the past experience that the petitioners have gained by now. It is expected that the respondent No. 2 shall take a decision by next date of hearing.” 6. It is not brought to the notice of this Court that any decision in compliance of the order of this Court has been taken on the representation of the petitioners. Therefore, this Court is deem it appropriate to disposed of this writ petition permitting the petitioner to make fresh representation which was decided by the respondent No.2 and 3 in pragmatically, sympathetically or also taking into the consideration, the past experience of the petitioners. The petitioners are at liberty to make a fresh representation to respondent No. 2 and 3 within a period 45 days from the date of -4- receipt of copy of this order. On such representation having been made, the respondents No. 2 and 3/ competent authority shall decide the same within further period of 120 days from the date of receipt of representation in accordance with law. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed anything on the merits of this case. 7. With these observation and direction, this writ petition is disposed of. 8. All pending applcations are also disposed of. Sd/- Sd/- Sd/- Sd/- (Sachin Singh Rajput) Judge Ashish