[3332 ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 16949 OF 2005 Between: M. Muna Swamy Reddy, 3/6. Subramanyam Reddy, aged about 35 years. Working as Attendfr-cum-Electrician, Tirupathi Co-Operative Bank, Tirupathi, Chittoor District. ...PETITIONER 1 The Divisional Cooperative Officer, Tirupathi, Chittoor District. 2. The Tirupathi Co-Operative Bank rep. by Chairman, Tirupathi, Chittoor District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction directing the respondents to regularize the the petitioner as Attender service of -cunirEtectrician by fixing regular pay scale and other consequential benefits in the 2nd respondent bank forthwith by declaring the action of the respondents in directing the petitioner not to attend the office without issuing any notice and without arbitrary, illegal and unconstitutional. J A, NO: 1 OF 2005(WPMP. NO: 21547 OF 7nni;| Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondents herein to continue the petitioner as Attender-cum-Electrician in the 2nd respondent bank. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI T NAGARJUNA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI M RAVINDRANATH Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR COOPERATION The Court made the following: . passing any order as REDDY } APHC010041562005 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 16949/2005 I Between: 1 i ...PETITIONER M. Muna Swamy Reddy, Chittoor District. AND ...RESPONDENT(S) The Divisional Cooperative Officer, Tirupathi & others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.TNAGARJUNA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.M RAVINDRANATH REDDY 2.GP FOR COOPERATION The Court made the following order: Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is not available at the given address and his whereabouts could not found and there is no information as to whether the petitioner is still in service and whether the cause in the Writ Petition survives or not. Recording the said submission, since the Writ Petition is of the year 2005 and the petitioner has no interest in prosecuting the case, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. However, if the petitioner feels that the cause in the Writ Petition still survives, he can file appropriate application within a period of two (2) months from today. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- G HELA NAIDU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// i To, 1. One CC to SRI. T NAGARJUNA REDDY Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to SRI. M RAVINDRANATH REDDY Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CCS to GP FOR COOPERATION .High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 4. Three CD Copies HIGH COURT DATED:24/04/2025 ORDER ,$ 13 JUN 2025 "a WP.No.16949 of 2005 THE WRIT PETITION IS DISMISSED FOR NON PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS