- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:38188 RSA No. 298 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 298 OF 2023 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. SRI CHANDRASHEKARA S/O LATE DYAVAIAH AGED 41 YEARS, 2. SRI.DHANANJAYA S/O LATE DYAVAIAH, AGED 39 YEARS, BOTH ARE R/AT MADEGOWDANADODDI VILLAGE, KOOTAGAL HOBLI, RAMANAGARA TALUK AND DISTRICT- 562 159 &APPELLANTS (BY SRI. V F KUMBAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT SHARADA D/O DYAVAIAH AGED 50 YEARS, 2. SMT.M.D.SARASWATHI D/O DYAVAIAH AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, SMT.D.BHAGYALAKSHMI SINCE DEAD BY LRS 3. SHWETHA AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:38188 RSA No. 298 of 2023 4. SHYRANKA AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, 5. HARANI AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, 6. SHYREAS AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, 7. SMT.JAYAMMA W/O DYAVAIAH AGED 72 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.32/A, 6TH MAIN, 2ND CROSS, SACHIDANANDA NAGARA, KENGERI UPANAGARA, BENGALURU-560 060. &RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K.H.SOMASHEKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1, R2, R6 AND R7) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 01.02.2021 PASSED IN RA.NO.12/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, RAMANAGARA. DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 12.12.2019 PASSED IN O.S.NO.364/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, RAMANAGARA. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:38188 RSA No. 298 of 2023 ORAL JUDGMENT Parties present with their respective counsels. They submitted a compromise petition under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 signed by the parties and their respective advocates. Along with the compromise petition, a sketch with the colour codification is also placed on record indicating the division of the property as per the sketch with colour codification in respect of Item No.2 alone. 2. In respect of the remaining properties, parties have amicably agreed to divide the property as per the compromise petition. 3. The contents of the compromise petition are read over to the parties in Kannada language and parties agree that the terms of the compromise petition depict to terms of settlement and there is no force, under influence or coercion in reaching out the terms of the compromise petition. 4. As such, there is no impediment for this Court to accept the compromise petition as it is out of the coalition of the - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:38188 RSA No. 298 of 2023 parties and amicably settled taking note of the long drawn litigation. 5. Hence the following: ORDER (i) The appeal stands disposed of in terms of the compromise petition. (ii) Office is directed to pass final decree in terms of the compromise petition appending the copy of the compromise petition along with the sketch as part of the decree. (iii) Parties are directed to bear their own costs. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 95