APHC010477692023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: Between: 1. PARNAPALLI NARAYANASWAMY, S/O P.NARAYANAPPA, AGE 61 YEARS, HINDU, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. D.NO. 1 NAGAR, ANANTAPURAM TOWN AND DISTRICT, A.P 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. A. P., 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT. ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTAPURAM RURAL RAPTHADU, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA P 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ANANTHAPUR RURAL POLICE STATION, ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. H NADEEM AHAMMAD, S/O H.NAZEER AHAMD, AGE 54 YEARS, R/O FLAT NO 604, PENT HOUSE, SIRI PARK VIEW APARTMENT, NEAR PARK, RAM NAGAR, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT, Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 25000/2023 PARNAPALLI NARAYANASWAMY, S/O P.NARAYANAPPA, AGE 61 YEARS, HINDU, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. D.NO. 1-308, DWARAKA NAGAR, ANANTAPURAM TOWN AND DISTRICT, A.P ...PETITIONER AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. A. P., THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTAPURAM RURAL RAPTHADU, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ANANTHAPUR RURAL POLICE STATION, ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. H NADEEM AHAMMAD, S/O H.NAZEER AHAMD, AGE 54 YEARS, R/O FLAT NO 604, PENT HOUSE, SIRI PARK VIEW APARTMENT, NEAR PARK, RAM NAGAR, ANANTHAPUR TOWN, ANANTHAPUR ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3396] THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA PARNAPALLI NARAYANASWAMY, S/O P.NARAYANAPPA, AGE 61 308, DWARAKA ...PETITIONER THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTAPURAM RURAL RADESH THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ANANTHAPUR RURAL POLICE STATION, ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. H NADEEM AHAMMAD, S/O H.NAZEER AHAMD, AGE 54 YEARS, R/O FLAT NO 604, PENT HOUSE, SIRI PARK VIEW APARTMENT, TOWN, ANANTHAPUR ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly a Writ in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 4th respondent in forcing the petitioners to settle the civil dispute with regard to the transaction of amount with 5th respondent herein even though the petitioners are not bound to pay any amount to 5th respondent and calling the petitioners to the police station by making calls to the petitioners and threatening and abusing the petitioners on phone that if the petitioners do not heed to his orders and act as per the wishes of the 5th respondent he would book false cases against the petitioners and see that he is behind bars, as being illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional being violative of Arts., 14, 19 (1) (g), 21 of the Constitution of India, part from various judicial pronouncements of this Hon'ble Court as well as the Hon'ble Apex Court and pass such other and further order or orders as are deemed fit and proper. IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the official respondents especially respondent no.4 not to harass the petitioner by calling them to come to the police station and asking them to settle the amount to the 5th respondent by threatening them to act as per the terms and conditions of the respondent No.5 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V NITESH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 25000/2023 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “....to to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly a Writ in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 4th respondent in forcing the petitioners to settle the civil dispute with regard to the transaction of amount with 5th respondent herein even though the petitioners are not bound to pay any amount to 5th respondent and calling the petitioners to the police station by making calls to the petitioners and threatening and abusing the petitioners on phone that if the petitioners do not heed to his orders and act as per the wishes of the 5th respondent he would book false cases against the petitioners and see that he is behind bars, as being illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional being violative of Arts., 14, 19 (1) (g), 21 of the Constitution of India, part from various judicial pronouncements of this Hon'ble Court as well as the Hon'ble Apex Court and pass such other and further order or orders as are deemed fit and proper....” 2. Heard Sri V.Nitesh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the police are calling the petitioners to the police station and interfering in the civil disputes. 4. The learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that the police are neither calling the petitioners to the police station nor interfering in the civil disputes pending between the petitioners and the unofficial respondents. 5. Recording the same, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties, except under due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 08.12.2025. KKV