2025:CGHC:49663 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 10778 of 2025 • Raju Lal Dewangan S/o Late Dashrath Lal Dewangan, Aged About 58 Years R/o Nawagarh, Tahsil Nawagarh, District- Bemetara ( C.G. ). ... Petitioner versus • Zila Shahkari Kendriya Bank Maryadit, Ge Road, Opposite Govt. Hospital Durg Acting In The Premises Through- Its Chief Executive Officer, Durg, District- Durg ( C.G. ). ... Respondents For Petitioner : Ms. Mitisha Kotecha, Advocate on behalf of Mr. B.P. Sharma, Advocate For Respondent : Mr. Manish Upadhyay, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 06/10/2025 1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs. “10.1 A writ and/ or an order in the nature of appropriate writ do issue calling for the records from the respondent authorities pertaining to the petitioner's case for its perusal and to ascertain the fact of arbitrariness and acting against the principles of law and natural justice in the facts and circumstances of the case. 10.2 A writ and/or an order in the nature of writ of certiorari do issue quashing the impugned order dated 25.8.2023 (Annexure P-1) as it has lost its vigor in last two years and since the same is in violation of petitioner's fundamental, constitutional rights and also rights under the service jurisprudence in fact in the facts and circumstances of the case. Or PAWAN KUMAR JHA Digitally signed by PAWAN KUMAR JHA A writ and/or an order in the nature of writ of mandamus do issue directing the respondent authorities to take decision on the petitioner's representation (Annexure P-4) and a further representation may also be ordered with a direction of taking the decision within the time. frame as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court in the facts and circumstances of the case. 10.3 Cost of the proceedings. 10.4 Any other writs and directions that may be deemed fit and just in the facts & circumstances of case. ” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that at this stage petitioner is seeking direction of this Court to respondent to take decision on the representation Annexure P-4 dated 19.05.2025 seeking enhancement of suspension allowance. 3. Learned counsel for respondent submits that in view of the limited grievance raised by learned counsel for petitioner seeking direction to respondent to take decision on the pending representation, he is having no objection. If the representation filed by petitioner is still pending consideration, it will be considered in accordance with law and appropriate decision will be taken at the earliest. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submission of learned counsel for the parties and also the submission of counsel for petitioner that the petitioner has already submitted a representation before respondent which is pending consideration, I find it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition at this stage directing respondent to take decision on the pending representation dated 19.05.2025 of petitioner in accordance with law at the earliest preferably within a further period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of order passed by this court. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) pwn JUDGE