Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010545522023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: Between:
1. SHAIK NAZEER AHAMED, S/O SHAIK DADA SAHEB, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS,
RIO FLAT NO. 101, SRI RAJYALAKSHMINIVAS, 1ST FLOOR, RIO SUBBAIAH COLONY, ONGOLE TOWN, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. SHAIK KALISHA VALI, S/O YEARS, PRESENTLY RESIDING IN STREET NO. 5, AL HAZZANA, SHARJAH, UAE, REPRESENTED BY HIS GPA HOLDER, SHAIK NAZEER AHAMED, S/O SHAIK DADA SAHEB
1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ONGOLE,PRAKASHAM DISTRICT, A.P.
3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ONGOLE,PRAKASHAM DISTRICT, A.P.
4. THE INSPECTOR OF STATION, ONGOLE,PRAKASHAM DISTRICT, A.P.
5. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ONGOLE TALUKA POLICE STATION, ONGOLE,PRAKASHAM DISTRICT, A.P.
6. SHAIK KARIMULLA, S/O BUDE SAHEB, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O.D.NO. 37-1-162/3, ISLAMAPE ONGOLE. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 28178/2023 SHAIK NAZEER AHAMED, S/O SHAIK DADA SAHEB, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS,
RIO FLAT NO. 101, SRI RAJYALAKSHMINIVAS, 1ST FLOOR, RIO SUBBAIAH COLONY, ONGOLE TOWN, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. SHAIK KALISHA VALI, S/O SHAIK DADA SAHEB, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, PRESENTLY RESIDING IN STREET NO. 5, AL HAZZANA, SHARJAH, UAE, REPRESENTED BY HIS GPA HOLDER, SHAIK NAZEER AHAMED, S/O SHAIK DADA SAHEB ...PETITIONER(S) AND THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.
THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ONGOLE,PRAKASHAM THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ONGOLE,PRAKASHAM DISTRICT, A.P. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ONGOLE TALUKA POLICE STATION, ONGOLE,PRAKASHAM DISTRICT, A.P.
THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ONGOLE TALUKA POLICE STATION, ONGOLE,PRAKASHAM DISTRICT, A.P.
SHAIK KARIMULLA, S/O BUDE SAHEB, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, 162/3, ISLAMAPETA-2, BESIDE GOPI THEATER, IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3396] THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA SHAIK NAZEER AHAMED, S/O SHAIK DADA SAHEB, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS,
RIO FLAT NO. 101, SRI RAJYALAKSHMINIVAS, 1ST FLOOR, RIO SUBBAIAH COLONY, ONGOLE TOWN, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. SHAIK DADA SAHEB, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, PRESENTLY RESIDING IN STREET NO.
5, AL HAZZANA, SHARJAH, UAE, REPRESENTED BY HIS GPA HOLDER, SHAIK ...PETITIONER(S) THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ONGOLE,PRAKASHAM THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, POLICE, ONGOLE TALUKA POLICE THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ONGOLE TALUKA POLICE SHAIK KARIMULLA, S/O BUDE SAHEB, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, 2, BESIDE GOPI THEATER,
7. SHAIK GHOUSE BASHA, S/O BUDE SAHEB, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/O D. NO. 37-1-16213, ISLAMAPETA-2ND, BESIDE GOPI HALL, ONGOLE
8. SHAIK KHADAR BASHA, S/O BUDE SAHEB, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/O D. NO. 37-1-162/3, ISLARNAPETA-2ND , BESIDE GOPI HALL, ONGOLE. 9. SHAIK RAHAMTHULLA, S/O BUDE SAHEB, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/O D. NO. 37-1-162/3, ISLAMAPETA-2ND , BESIDE GOPI HALL, ONGOLE. 10. SHAIK FAIZULLA, S/O BUDE SAHEB, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O D. NO. 37-1-162/3, ISLAMAPETA-2ND , BESIDE GOPI HALL, ONGOLE. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly a Writ in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents especially Respondent No. 4 and 5 in calling the petitioner herein to the police station and forcing the petitioner to settle civil disputes by way of either dispossessing the petitioner herein from the his lawful possession of the property in Sy. No 613/IE, to an extent of Ac.
No 613/IE, to an extent of Ac. 2.16 cents and Ac.1.02 cents in KoppoluVillage,Ongole town , Prakasam district and handing over the same to the unofficial respondents or to pay humongous amount worth the value of the aforementioned property and to act as per the terms of unofficial respondents as being arbitrary, illegal and violation of Article 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India apart from violative of Principles of Natural Justiceapart from various judicial pronouncements of this Hon'ble Court as well as the Hon'ble Apex Court and consequently direct the Respondent No. 4 and 5 not to call the petitioner to the police station without there being any crime registered against the petitioner and not to interfere in civil disputes pending between petitioner and the unofficial respondents and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the official respondents especially respondent no.4 and 5 not to call the petitioner to the police station and harass the petitioner for settling the civil disputes pending between the petitioner and the unofficial respondentsand threatening the petitioner that they shall dispossess the petitioner from the lawful possession of his property in Sy. No 613/IE, to an
extent of Ac. 2.16 cents and Ac.1.02 cents in KoppoluVillage,Ongole town, Prakasam district and hand over the same to the unofficial respondents herein, pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. AYESHA AZMA S Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
2. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 28178/2023
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“....to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly a Writ in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents especially Respondent No. 4 and 5 in calling the petitioner herein to the police station and forcing the petitioner to settle civil disputes by way of either dispossessing the petitioner herein from the his lawful possession of the property in Sy. No 613/IE, to an extent of Ac. 2.16 cents and Ac.1.02 cents in KoppoluVillage,Ongole town , Prakasam district and handing over the same to the unofficial respondents or to pay humongous amount worth the value of the aforementioned property and to act as per the terms of unofficial respondents as being arbitrary, illegal and violation of Article 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India apart from violative of Principles of Natural Justiceapart from various judicial pronouncements of this Hon'ble Court as well as the Hon'ble Apex Court and consequently direct the Respondent No. 4 and 5 not to call the petitioner to the police station without there being any crime registered against the petitioner and not to interfere in civil disputes pending between petitioner and the unofficial respondents and to pass..”
2. Heard Ms.Ayesha Azma, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, would submit that based on the report given by the unofficial respondent No.6, the police registered a case in Crime No.705 of 2023 on 05.10.2023 for the offence punishable under Section 420 IPC against the petitioners herein. Therefore, police are calling the petitioners only for inquiry purpose in the above case. Except for the purpose of the said
case, the police are not interfering with the civil disputes of the petitioners and the unofficial respondents. 5. Considering the submissions, the writ petition is disposed of. However, police are directed to follow due process of law regarding the crime which is registered against the petitioner. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Date: 08.12.2025.
KKV
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
311
WRIT PETITION NO: 28178/2023
Dated 08.12.2025 KKV
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATI MAIN CASE NO.: W.P.No.28178 of 2023 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. Date
ORDER OFFICE NOTE
1
08.12.2025
Dr.VJP,J
The Writ Petition is disposed of.
(Vide separate order)
________ Dr.VJP, J KKV