Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51260 (AP)

BOTTA APPARAO v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/6210/2024 · 2025-11-21

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010115332024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] SATURDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 6210/2024 Between: BOTTA APPARAO, S/O. LATE KATAMA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE (COOLIE), R/O. D.NO.2-64, AMBATIPETA, BICCAVOLU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, A.P. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR, A.P. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, A.P. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ANAPARTHI, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, A.P. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, BICCAVOLU POLICE STATION, BICCAVOLU MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, A.P. 5. DUNDI VENKATA RAMANA, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE (COOLIE), R/O. AMBATIPETA, BICCAVOLU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, A.P. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K GANI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents 1 to 4 in not registering the case against the Respondent No.5 even 2 though the petitioner had lodged a complaint before the 4th respondent on 08-11-2023, as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 4 to register the case and arrest the Respondent No.5.” 2. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the contents of the complaint submitted by the Petitioner would disclose non-cognizable offences, and as such, the Police have not registered any case based on the complaint given by the Petitioner. 3. Sri K.Gani Reddy, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that, recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the Petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedies before appropriate forum in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:22.11.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.6210 of 2024 Dt.22.11.2025 Dinesh