- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48521 WP No. 35034 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 35034 OF 2025 (KLR-REG) BETWEEN: 1. NARASIMHAIAH S/O LATE NINGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/AT SIDDAIAHNA DODDI, BIDADI HOBLI, RAMANAGARA TALUK, BANGALURU SOUTH DISTRICT-562 159 & PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHARATH S GOWDA., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, M S BUILDING, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE - 560 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, RAMANAGARA, BANGALORE SOUTH DISTRICT, DC OFFICE, RAMANAGARA - 562 159 Digitally signed by VIJAYA P Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48521 WP No. 35034 of 2025 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA, B.M.ROAD, RAMANAGARA - 562 159 4. THE TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, RAMANAGARA - 562 159 5. THE COMMITTEE FOR REGULARISATION OF UNAUTHORISED OCCUPATION, RAMANAGARA TALUK, RAMANAGARA - 562 159, REPRESENTED BY ITS EX-OFFICIO MEMBER AND SECRETARY. & RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHAMANTH NAIK, HCGP) *** THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 11.08.2022 PASSED IN NO. RAJIKA- LND/CR/401/2022 BY THE R2 DEPUTY COMMISSIONER VIDE ANNEXURE-A QUA THE PETITIONER AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48521 WP No. 35034 of 2025 ORAL ORDER The petitioner has called in question the correctness of the order dated 11.08.2022 at Annexure-A which is an order of the Deputy Commissioner rejecting application of the petitioner seeking regularisation as being ineligible. 2. Learned Additional Government Advocate submits that the said order must be treated to be original order against which appeal could be filed under Section 49 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964. 3. In light of availability of substantive remedy, the petition is disposed off relegating the petitioner to avail of the substantive remedy against the impugned order. The time spent before this court may be taken note of. 4. All contentions are kept open. Office to return the certified copies of the orders if filed, after retaining the photostat copies in the office file. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE NP