APHC010834142017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] FRIDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 36196/2017 Between: 1. REGIONAL MANAGER APSRTC, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, KADAPA, KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE REGIONAL SECRETARY TRANSPPORT CORPORATION ANOTHER, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION NATIONAL MAZDOOR UNION, REPRESENTED ON BEHALF OF SRI M.V. RAMUDU, CONDUCTOR, E. NO: 402303, ANANTAPUR DEPOT. ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 2. THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, ANANTAPURAMU, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari calling for records relating to the award made in I.D.No. 192 of 2012, dated 02.09.2014 on the file of the Labour Court, Anantapur, which was published in the gazette vide G.O.Rt.No. 925, dated 27.11.2014, as illegal, arbitrary and quash the same and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 44968 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the award dated 02.09.2014 made in I.D.No. 192 of 2012 on the file of Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, Ananthapur pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. ARAVALA RAMA RAO(SC FOR APSRTC KKAC) Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR LABOUR (AP) The Court made the following ORDER: 1. On 12.12. 2015, this Court passed the following order: “No representation for the petitioner. Post next week under the caption ‘for dismissal’. 2. Today also, there is no representation for the petitioner as well as respondents, though the matter is listed under the caption “for dismissal”. 3. In the above circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 19.12.2025 Dvs THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM 30 WRIT PETITION No.36196 of 2017 Date: 19.12.2025 Dvs