Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51249 (AP)

Koduru Gowri, v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/19744/2021 · 2025-12-21

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010329652021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MONDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: Between: 1. KODURU GOWRI,, W/O. K. BATHI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. H. NO. 1 YERPEDU MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 517641. 2. 2. KODURU BAKTHAVATSAL REDDY,, S/O. K. BATHI REDDY, ABOUT 32 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. H. NO. 1 BANDARU PALLI VILLAGE, YERPEDU MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 3. 3 KODURU OBUL REDDY,, S/O. K. BATHI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, OCC PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, R/O. H. NO. 1 PALLI VILLAGE, YERPEDU MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYATRAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, CHITTOOR. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, YERPEDU MANDAL, YERPEDU, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. THE MANDAL PARISATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, YERPEDU MANDAL, YERPEDU, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. THE BANDARUPALLI GRAM PANCHAYATH, REP. BY ITS PANCHAYAT SECRETRY, BANDARUPALLI, YERPEDU MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 19744/2021 KODURU GOWRI,, W/O. K. BATHI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. H. NO. 1-343, BANDARU PALLI VILLAGE, YERPEDU MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 2. KODURU BAKTHAVATSAL REDDY,, S/O. K. BATHI REDDY, ABOUT 32 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. H. NO. 1 BANDARU PALLI VILLAGE, YERPEDU MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 517641. 3 KODURU OBUL REDDY,, S/O. K. BATHI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, OCC PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, R/O. H. NO. 1-343, BAN PALLI VILLAGE, YERPEDU MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 517641. ...PETITIONER(S) AND THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYATRAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, CHITTOOR. THE TAHSILDAR, YERPEDU MANDAL, YERPEDU, CHITTOOR THE MANDAL PARISATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, YERPEDU MANDAL, YERPEDU, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. BANDARUPALLI GRAM PANCHAYATH, REP. BY ITS PANCHAYAT SECRETRY, BANDARUPALLI, YERPEDU MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332] MONDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI KODURU GOWRI,, W/O. K. BATHI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, 343, BANDARU PALLI VILLAGE, YERPEDU MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 2. KODURU BAKTHAVATSAL REDDY,, S/O. K. BATHI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. H. NO. 1-343, BANDARU PALLI VILLAGE, YERPEDU MANDAL, CHITTOOR 3 KODURU OBUL REDDY,, S/O. K. BATHI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 31 343, BANDARU PALLI VILLAGE, YERPEDU MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ...PETITIONER(S) THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYATRAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, CHITTOOR. THE TAHSILDAR, YERPEDU MANDAL, YERPEDU, CHITTOOR THE MANDAL PARISATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, YERPEDU BANDARUPALLI GRAM PANCHAYATH, REP. BY ITS PANCHAYAT SECRETRY, BANDARUPALLI, YERPEDU MANDAL, ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or orders more particularly one in the nature of the writ of mandamus, by declaring the action of the 3rd and 5th respondent authorities trying to dig the borewell in the petitioner property in Sy.No. 263/2 to an extent of 1 1/2 cents and 133.2 Sq. yards situated at Mannasamudram Survey group, Yerpedu Mandal, Srikalahasti Sub-District, Chittoor District is illegal, arbitrary, violation of principles of Natural justice and violation of Article 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India, IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd and 5th respondent authorities not to interfer in the petitioners subject property in Sy.No. 263/2 to an extent of 1 1/2 cents and 133.2 Sq. yards situated at Mannasamudram Survey group, Yerpedu Mandal, Srikalahasti Sub-District, Chittoor District, pending disposal of the above writ petition IA NO: 2 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders granted on 07-09-2021 in WP.No.19744/2021 and dismiss the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. CH VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV 3. V VINOD K REDDY (SC FOR ZP MPDO GP) ORDER The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondent authorities are trying to dig a bore well in her property in an extent of Ac.0-01 ½ cents and 133.2 Sq.yards situated in Mannasamudram Survey Group, Yerpedu Mandal, Srikalahasti. 2. Sri M.Sudheer, learned Standing Counsel, submitted that the Gram Panchayat had never passed any resolution for digging a bore well in the petitioner’s site as alleged by her. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, on counter, submitted that they are not digging any bore well in the site of the petitioner. 4. Sri Ch.Venkat Raman, learned counsel for the petitioner prayed to record the submissions made by learned counsel for the respondents and dispose of the writ petition. 5. In view of the stand taken by respondents that they are not digging any bore well in the subject property, this writ petition can be disposed of. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the respondent authorities not to dig any bore well in the subject property, except by following due process of law, if they are desirous of digging any bore well. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI DATED 22ND day of December, 2025. RR