- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50084 WP No. 26581 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 26581 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI VIJAYAKUMAR MALLIKARJUN DONI S/O MALIKARJUN DONI AGED : MAJOR RESIDING AT 56 MUKUND NAGAR STATION ROAD, VIJAYAPURA - 586 104. &PETITIONER (BY SRI. KULKARNI SHRINATH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE SPECIAL OFFICER AND THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY FOR IMA AND OTHER SCAM CASES AND COMPETENT AUTHORITY FOR M/S. SEVENHILLS SOUHARDHA SAHAKARA CO-OPERATIVE PVT. LTD, REPRESENTED BY IT IS COMPETENT AUTHORITY SHRI. AMLAN ADITYA BISWAS AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS OFFICE AT SPLOCA, 3RD FLOOR PODIUM BLOCK, MINI V.V. TOWER DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU - 560001. Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50084 WP No. 26581 of 2025 2. M/S SEVENHILLS SOUHARDHA SAHAKARA CO-OPERATIVE PVT LTD REP BY IT IS MANAGING DIRECTOR SHRI. G.NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS RESIDING AT JANANI BHAVAN, MARUTI EXTENSION MALUR TOWN, MALUR TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT - 563130. 3. SRI EKANATH NAMDEV DHAGE S/O NAMDEV DHAGE, DIRECTOR OF M/S SEVENHILLS SOUHARDHA SAHAKARA CO-OPERATIVE PVT LTD AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS OCC : AGRICULTURIST RESIDING AT AHERI VIJAYAPURA TALUK VIJAYAPURA - 586101. &RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VEERESH BUDIHAL, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. B.V. MADHAVAMURTHY, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE MISCELLANEOUS PETITION PREFERRED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 - THE MISC NO.686/2025 U/S 13(1) OF KARNATAKA PROTECTION OF INTEREST OF DEPOSITORS IN FINANCIAL ESTABLISHMENT ACT, 2004 PENDING BEFORE THE XCI ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE BENGALURU (CCH-92) VIDE ANNEXURE -E. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50084 WP No. 26581 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. In this Writ Petition, it is the case of the petitioner that, petitioner is in no way concerned with respect to the allegations made against him in Misc.No.686/2025(Annexure-E), pending on the file of XCI Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru. 3. Having taken note of the averments made in the petition filed in the above case i.e., Misc.No.686/2015, I am of the view that, no interference of this Court is called for in this Writ Petition. However, it is open for the petitioner to agitate his rights before the competent Court. 4. With the above observation, the Writ Petition is disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3