- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22993 WP No. 3475 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO. 3475 OF 2025 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN: M/S. SHAKTHI HILL RESORTS PVT. LTD., A LIMITED COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER COMPANY ACT OFFICE AT BEML LAYOUT, RAJARAJESHWARI NAGAR, BENGALURU 3 560 098. REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, MR.A.RAMESH ARUN, S/O.SRI.R.ARUNACHALAM, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OFFICE AT BEML LAYOUT, RAJARAJESHWARI NAGAR, BENGALURU 3 560 098. &PETITIONER (BY SRI. MANJUNATHA S.V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, THE URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, 4TH FLOOR, VIKASSOUDHA, DR. AMBEDKARVEDI, BANGALORE 3 560 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22993 WP No. 3475 of 2025 2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT OF PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS AND LEGISLATION, VIKASA SOUDHA, DR. B.R.AMBEDKARVEEDHI, BANGALORE 3 560 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 3. BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, N.R SQUARE, BANGALORE 3 560 002, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, 4. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR TOWN PLANNING, (RAJARAJESHWARINAGAR), OFFICE AT 18TH CROSS, IDEAL HOE LAYOUT, R.R.NAGAR, NEAR BESCOM OFFICE, BENGALURU 3 560 098. &RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.BOPANNA B, AGA FOR R1 AND R2; SRI.K.B.MONISH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R3 AND R4) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE KARNATAKA MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS AND CERTAIN OTHER LAW(AMENDMENT) ACT 2021 ACT NO.1/2022 DATED 13/01/2022 ENACTED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT PUBLISHED THROUGH NOTIFICATION BEARING NO.DPAL 50 SHASANA 2021 GAZETTE ON 13/01/2022 AT ANNEXURE-E DECLARING IT TO BE ULTRAVIRES AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22993 WP No. 3475 of 2025 ORAL ORDER Petitioner, in the captioned petition has sought for following reliefs: (i) Issue a writ of certiorari or similar writ or order or direction to quash the Karnataka Municipal Corporations and Certain other law(amendment) act 2021 act No.1/2022 dated 13/01/2022 enacted by the second respondent published through notification bearing No.DPAL 50 SHASANA 2021 gazette on 13/01/2022 at ANNEXURE-E declaring it to be ultravires and unconstitutional. (ii) Issue writ of certiorari or similar writ or order or direction to quash the office order bearing No. ADTP/PR/461/2021-22 dated 09/03/2022 issued by the third respondent at ANNEXURE-F. (iii) Issue a writ of certiorari to quash the demand notice bearing No: BBMP/Ad.Com/RJH/1039/24-25 dated 31/01/2025, EXURE-B issued by the respondent No.4 at 18th Cross, office of the Assistant Director Town planning (Rajarajeshwrainagar) R.R.Nagar, Bengaluru Ward No:160, Rajarajeshwarinagarzone Bengaluru in so far as demand notice towards. Fee payable to BBMP and Labourcess. (iv) Issue writ of Certiorari or similar writ, order or direction to quash the Circular bearing No.He. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22993 WP No. 3475 of 2025 Ni.Ka.Pa.Ko/P.A/320/2020-21 dated 14/08/2020 at ANNEXURE-G issued by the 3rd Respondent. (v) Issue a writ of Certiorari or similar writ or order or direction to quash provisions of section 18-A of Karnataka Town and Country Planning act, 1961 brought into effect by Karnataka act No.23 of 2004 by the 2nd respondent at ANNEXURE-H in so far as 18-A (i) and ) (iv) of Karnataka act No.23 of 2004 is concerned. (vi) Grant an order, direction or writ in the nature of Certiorari quashing the notification issued by the 1st respondent bearing No.UDD 3TTP 2015 dated 25/2/2020 as contained in ANNEXURE-J in so far as the amended Rule 37-A and rule 37-C are concerned. (vii) Issue any other appropriate writ or order or direction to the respondents' demand fit in the circumstances of the case in the interest of justice and equity. (viii) Pass any such other orders as this Hon'ble court deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the case in the interest justice and equity. 2. It is brought to the notice of this Court that across the Bar, the issue is dealt by the Co-ordinate Bench in the reported judgment in W.P.No.23086/2022 and connected matters. The Co-ordinate Bench, while - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22993 WP No. 3475 of 2025 deciding the issue, has set-aside the Karnataka Municipal Corporations and Certain Other Law (Amendment) Act, 2021 (Karnataka Act No.01 of 2022) and the Karnataka Municipal Corporations and Certain Other Law (Amendment) Act, 2023, (Karnataka Act No.37 of 2024). Therefore, this Court deems it fit to cull out the operative portion of the order, which reads as under; "ORDER (i) The writ petitions are partly allowed. (ii) The Karnataka Municipal Corporations and Certain Other Law (Amendment) Act, 2021 (Karnataka Act No.01 of 2022), is hereby quashed and set aside. (iii) The Karnataka Municipal Corporations and Certain Other Law (Amendment) Act, 2023, (Karnataka Act No.37 of 2024), is hereby quashed and set aside. (iv) It is hereby declared that the provisions contained in Section 18-A of the Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961, read with Rules 37-A and 37-C of the Karnataka Planning Authority Rules, 1965, are applicable only in respect of 8Development Plan9 containing the proposal for construction on plots measuring more than 20,000 square meters in extent and not in respect of plots measuring less than 20,000 square meters. - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22993 WP No. 3475 of 2025 (v) It is hereby declared that if fee has been earlier collected for change of land use or while approving a layout plan, fee shall not be collected for subsequent 8Development Plan9 in terms of the 8Note9 found below TABLE I of Rule 37-A of the Karnataka Planning Authority Rules, 1965. (vi) It is hereby declared that the linking of the fee leviable under Rule 37-A of the Karnataka Planning Authority Rules, 1965, to the 8market value9 or 8guidance value9 as determined under Section 45-B of the Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957, is illegal. However, liberty is reserved to the respondent-State Government and the BBMP to re-fix a standard after collecting empherical data. (vii) Consequently, all the impugned Circulars which seek to give effect to the Rules 37-A and 37-C of the Karnataka Planning Authority Rules, 1965, are hereby quashed and set aside. (viii) It is hereby declared that Clause 3.8 of the Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike Building Bye- laws, 2003, providing for 8Ground Rent9, is illegal and are accordingly quashed and set aside. (ix) Consequently, all the impugned Demand Notices raised by the respondent-BBMP, in respect of the writ petitioners herein are also quashed and set aside. It would be advisable that the BBMP may come out with a scheme for 8One Time Settlement9 and settle the levy and collect the fee generally acceptable to the - 7 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22993 WP No. 3475 of 2025 citizens of Bengaluru. This would also augment the present situation." 3. In the present writ petition, the core issue raised stands substantially covered and decided by the authoritative pronouncement of the coordinate bench, wherein the writ petitions were partly allowed and several consequential reliefs were granted. The Hon9ble Court, in unequivocal terms, quashed and set aside the Karnataka Municipal Corporations and Certain Other Law (Amendment) Acts of 2021 and 2023 (Karnataka Act Nos.01 of 2022 and 37 of 2024 respectively). 4. The Court further declared that the provisions under Section 18-A of the Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961, read with Rules 37-A and 37-C of the Karnataka Planning Authority Rules, 1965, are applicable only to development proposals concerning plots exceeding 20,000 square meters, and not to smaller plots. Importantly, it was also held that if a fee has been previously collected for change of land use or approval of - 8 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22993 WP No. 3475 of 2025 layout plan, no further fee shall be levied for subsequent development plans, in view of the explanatory 'Note' to Table I of Rule 37-A. 5. The Court declared illegal the linkage of such levies to market or guidance value under Section 45-B of the Karnataka Stamp Act, and consequently, quashed all Circulars and demand notices issued to give effect to such unlawful interpretations. Clause 3.8 of the BBMP Building Bye-laws, 2003, imposing 'Ground Rent', was also struck down. 6. In view of these comprehensive declarations and findings, it is submitted that the controversy raised in the present writ petition no longer survives for adjudication independently, as it is squarely covered by the binding judgment of the coordinate bench. In the light of the law laid down in the reported judgment substantially covering the issue, which is raised in the captioned writ - 9 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22993 WP No. 3475 of 2025 petition, the writ petition is liable to be allowed strictly aligning to the operative portion of the said writ petition. 7. In view of the above, this Court proceeds to pass the following; ORDER (i) The writ petition is allowed. (ii) The impugned demand notice dated 31.01.2025 issued by respondent No.4 as per Annexure-B is hereby set-aside. (iii) Respondent- BBMP hereby directed to issue fresh/modified plan as the case may be. (iv) Respondent- BBMP is hereby directed to forthwith process the petitioner's application seeking building license and sanction of the building plan, strictly in accordance with law. (v) It is made clear that the issuance of the building license and approval plan shall not be withheld merely on the ground that the - 10 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22993 WP No. 3475 of 2025 BBMP is contemplating to file an appeal against the reported judgment. (vi) If the building license and sanction plan are issued, the same shall be subjected to the outcome of any appeal that may be filed by the BBMP against the judgment. Pending applications, if any, are also disposed off. Sd/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE SMJ List No.: 2 Sl No.: 10