SRI B V SRIKUMAR v. THE TRIBUNAL OF MAINTENANCE OF WELFARE
WP/9772/2022 · 2025-11-24
E S Indiresh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51239 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51239 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48449 WP No. 9772 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.9772 OF 2022 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. B.V. SRIKUMAR S/O LATE VENKATARAMANIAH AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS R/AT APARTMENT NO. G-6, GROUND FLOOR, ARMUGHAM CIRCLE, BRIGADE CLASSIC APARTMENTS BASAVANAGUDI BENGALURU - 560004. &PETITIONER (BY SRI. LEELADHAR H.P., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE TRIBUNAL OF MAINTENANCE OF WELFARE OF PARENTS AND SENIOR CITIZENSHIP AND ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU NORTH SUB DIVISION, KANDAYA BHAVAN K.G. ROAD, BENGALURU 560009
2.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT
Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48449 WP No. 9772 of 2022
BENGALURU AND THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR MAINTENANCE AND WELFARE OF PARENTS AND SENIOR CITIZEN AT BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT - 560009.
3.
SMT. MONISHA S GAURI D/O SRIKUMAR B V W/O NAVEEN VEERA R/AT NO.2507, 17TH MAIN, 26TH CROSS, BANASHANKARI II STAGE, BENGALURU - 560 070. &RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR, AGA FOR R1 & R2;
SMT. BHUSHANI KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R3)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 05.12.2021 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 HEREIN APPEAL NO.MAG(4)CR/42/2019-20 UNDER ANNEXURE-A; AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48449 WP No. 9772 of 2022
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
ORAL ORDER
It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that the prayer made in the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4