Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51239 (KAR)

SRI B V SRIKUMAR v. THE TRIBUNAL OF MAINTENANCE OF WELFARE

WP/9772/2022 · 2025-11-24

E S Indiresh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48449 WP No. 9772 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.9772 OF 2022 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. B.V. SRIKUMAR S/O LATE VENKATARAMANIAH AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS R/AT APARTMENT NO. G-6, GROUND FLOOR, ARMUGHAM CIRCLE, BRIGADE CLASSIC APARTMENTS BASAVANAGUDI BENGALURU - 560004. &PETITIONER (BY SRI. LEELADHAR H.P., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE TRIBUNAL OF MAINTENANCE OF WELFARE OF PARENTS AND SENIOR CITIZENSHIP AND ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU NORTH SUB DIVISION, KANDAYA BHAVAN K.G. ROAD, BENGALURU 560009 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48449 WP No. 9772 of 2022 BENGALURU AND THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR MAINTENANCE AND WELFARE OF PARENTS AND SENIOR CITIZEN AT BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT - 560009. 3. SMT. MONISHA S GAURI D/O SRIKUMAR B V W/O NAVEEN VEERA R/AT NO.2507, 17TH MAIN, 26TH CROSS, BANASHANKARI II STAGE, BENGALURU - 560 070. &RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR, AGA FOR R1 & R2; SMT. BHUSHANI KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 05.12.2021 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 HEREIN APPEAL NO.MAG(4)CR/42/2019-20 UNDER ANNEXURE-A; AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48449 WP No. 9772 of 2022 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that the prayer made in the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4