Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51234 (AP)

G.AMARESWARAPPA v. SRI.SHASHIBHUSHAN KUMAR

CC/469/2025 · 2025-12-04

B Krishna Mohan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010073262025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] FRIDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN CONTEMPT CASE NO: 469/2025 Between: 1. G.AMARESWARAPPA, S/O. G.NAGAPPA, AGE 46 YEARS R/O. H.N0.45/142-26G, VENKATARAMANA COLONY, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI SHASHIBHUSHAN KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYATH RAJ DEPARTMENT A.P. SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 3. SRI BUDITHI RAJASEKHAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, AGRICULTURAL AND CO OPERATIVE DEPARTMENT AP SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 4. SRI S DILLI RAO, THE COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURAL MARKETING, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. SRI C V SUBBA REDDY, THE CHIEF ENGINEER, PANCHAYAT RAJ CIRCLE, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 6. SRI V RAMA CHANDRA REDDY, THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, PANCHAYATI RAJ CIRCLE, KURNOOL KURNOOL DISTRICT. 2 7. SRI DC VENKATESU, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PANCHAYATH RAJ PRI DIVISION, ADONI, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 8. SRI M VIJAYA SUNEETHA, THE COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURAL MARKETING, GUNTUR,GUNTUR DISTRICT 9. SRI BALU NAIK, THE CHIEF ENGINEER,PANCHAYAT RAJ CIRCLE,VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. RR 8 AND 9 IMPLEADED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 26/09/25,VIDE IA.NO- 2/2025 IN CC NO-469 OF 2025 ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to take to cognizance the offence of Contempt of Court committed by the respondents here in and to punish them for violating the orders dated 18.09.2024 passed in W.P No. 17611 of 2024 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to order dispense with the filing of the Certified Copy of the order dated 18.09.2024 passed in WP. No. 17611 of 2024 and to pass IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to implead the Proposed Respondents as Respondents Nos. 8 & 9 in C.C.No. 469 of 2025 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MARELLA RADHA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. OMKAR D 2. BH RAMA KRISHNA NAIK The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.KRISHNA MOHAN CONTEMPT CASE NO: 469 of 2025 ORDER:- The learned counsels on both sides submit that the order under contempt has already been complied with. 2. In view of the same, no further orders are necessary in this Contempt Case. 3. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN Dt: 05.12.2025 sj 4 61 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.KRISHNA MOHAN CONTEMPT CASE NO: 469 of 2025 Dt: 05.12.2025 sj