Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5123 (CHH)

DR. RADHAKRISHNA RAMCHANDANI v. DIRECTOR, ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES

WPS/957/2024 · 2025-07-17

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Smt Rajani Dubey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:33966-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 957 of 2024 1 - Dr. Radhakrishna Ramchandani S/o Late Brahmananda Ramchandani Aged About 47 Years (General Surgery) R/o B-16 Ashiyana-I, Near Vijay Nagar Chowk, Avanti Vihar, Raipur, Tehsil And District Raipur, Chhattisgarh P I N 492006 Presently Working As Associate Professor, Department Of General Surgery A I I M S, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Director, All India Institute Of Medical Sciences Through Its Director, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Deputy Director (Administration) All India Institude Of Medical Sciences, Through Its Director, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - The President / Chairman All India Institude Of Medical Sciences, Through Its Director, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh,(Note Both Are Same Post And Is Being Used In Working In The Respondent Institute) 4 - Administrative Officer All India Institude Of Medical Sciences, Through Its Director, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from the Case Information System) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- VISHAKHA BEOHAR Digitally signed by VISHAKHA BEOHAR 2 For Petitioner :- Dr. Shiv Kumar Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondents :- Mrs. Hameeda Siddiqui, Advocate ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DB- Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey & Hon’ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order On Board 18/07/2025 1. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the final order has already been passed and a minor penalty has been imposed upon the petitioner. 2. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw the petition with liberty to file afresh, raising all the grounds and addressing the final order which was subsequently passed on October 19, 2023, before the concerned Central Administrative Tribunal in the original application. 3. Accordingly, the present petition stands dismissed as withdrawn, with the aforesaid liberty reserved in favor of the petitioner. sd/- sd/- (Rajani Dubey) (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Judge Vishakha