VINOD KUMAR AND ANR. v. SURESH KUMAR,SECY.HOME AND ORS.
CPSW/355/2013 · 2025-02-17
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5122 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5122 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CPSW No. 355/2013 in SWP No. 2639/2010
Vinod Kumar and Anr. …. Petitioner(s)
Through :- None.
V/s
Suresh Kumar, Secy. Home and Ors. ….Respondent(s)
Through :- None.
Coram:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER
17.02.2025.
The instant contempt petition has been preferred against the
order/judgment passed by this Court dated 17.12.2012 in which the notice was issued by this Court way back on 10.09.2013. The respondents have filed the detailed statement of facts in which specific stand has been taken that order/
judgment passed by this Court stands complied with.
In the light of the stand taken by the respondents, no fruitful purpose will be served to keep this contempt petition alive.
Accordingly, the proceedings in the instant contempt petition stands closed.
Rule, if any, shall stand discharged.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge Jammu:
17.02.2025. Neha-1
Sr.No. 45 Neha Kumari 2025.02.18 20:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document