Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51219 (CHH)

SAMAR HAVALDAR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/3233/2025 · 2025-10-28

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:52712 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 3233 of 2025 Samar Havaldar S/o Khokan Havaldar Aged About 37 Years R/o Malkhangiri M.V. 26 Thana District - Malkhangiri Odisha. ... Applicant(s) versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through P.S.- Tongpal District- Sukuma (C.G.) ... Non-applicant(s) For Applicant : None For Non-applicant/State : Mr. Amit Verma, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 29.10.2025 1. This is an o7ce reference. 2. This Court, vide order dated 06.11.2024 passed in MCRC No. 6444 of 2024, while allowing the bail to the applicant, namely, Samar Havaldar had expressed its trust that the trial Court would make an earnest endeavor to conclude the trial expeditiously in accordance with law, preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a certi:ed copy of the order, if there was no legal impediment. 3. Earlier on one occasion also this Court had granted extension of time for compliance of the order dated 06.11.2024. 4. The learned Special Judge (NDPS Act), South Bastar, Dantewada KUNAL DEWANGAN Digitally signed by KUNAL DEWANGAN 2 District-South Bastar Dantewada (C.G.) vide his request letter dated 04.09.2025 has requested for grant of one month’s additional time for concluding the trial. 5. It transpires from perusal of the PUD that as an application under Section 311 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been submitted on behalf of the prosecution and the defence side has also sought an opportunity to adduce evidence, it has not been possible to dispose of the case within the prescribed time period. Hence, it is most respectfully prayed before this Court that a further period of one month may kindly be granted for the proper disposal of the case. 6. The request appears to be reasonable. The concerned trial Court is directed to conclude the trial as early as possible, preferably within a further period of one month from the date of receipt of a certi:ed copy of this order. 7. Accordingly, this CRMP stands disposed o5 with the aforesaid direction. 8. Registry is directed to send a certi:ed copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Kunal