O'" IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 10594 OF 2025 Between: 1. Kanjula Gayathri Reddy, D/o. K. Sreerama Chandra Reddy, Age.21 years, R/o, Fiat No. 105, Venna heights, Hailand Road, Chinna kakani, Guntur District. 2. Kanjula Pujitha Reddy, D/o, K.Purashotama Reddy, Age 24 years R/o, 304, Venkatagiri appartments, Vidhyanagar 0 line, Guntur, Guntur District. 3. Kanjula Hasitha Reddy, D/o. K. Purashotama Reddy, Age 14 years, R/o. 304 Venkatagiri appartment, Vidhyanagar 0 line, Guntur, Guntur District. Being a minor Rep.by her father, K. Purashotama Reddy. S/o. Bapi Reddy, age 51 years, R/o. 3-89, Vaddamanu Village, IhulJur Mandal, Guntur District. ...Petitioners AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Velgapudi, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, Guntur District, Guntur. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Guntur, Guntur District. 4. The Tahasildar, Thullur, Thullur Mandal, Guntur District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring action of the 4*^ respondent altering nature of the agricultural land of the 1 may one petitioner’s land in an extent Ac 0.81 cents in Survey No. 65 in Vaddamanu Village, Thullur Mandal, Guntur District, and the 2 nd petitioner’s land measuring an extent Ac 0.81 cents in Survey No. 65 in Vaddamanu Village, Thullur Mandal, Guntur District and the 3'^'^ petitioner land measuring an extent Ac 0.81 cents in Survey No. 65 in Vaddamanu Village, Thullur Mandal, Guntur District in revenue records without issuing any notice and without following the procedure contemplated under law is illegal, improper, arbitrary and unconstitutional and violation of Articles 14 and A.P rights in land and pattadhar pass books Act and Rules consequently direct the consequently direct the 4th respondent not to change the nature of the land in Adangal , 1 -B and Revenue records in regarding the petitioners land admeasuring agricultural land of the 1®‘ petitioner’s land in an extent Ac 0.81 cents in Survey No. 65 in Vaddamanu Village, Thullur Mandal, Guntur District, and the 2 nd petitioner’s land measuring an extent Ac 0.81 cents in Survey No. 65 in Vaddamanu Village, Thullur Mandal, Guntur District and the 3rd petitioner land measuring an extent Ac 0.81 cents in Survey No. 65 in Vaddamanu Village, Thullur Mandal, Guntur District. lA NO: 1 OF 202H Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be / pleased to direct the 4'^ respondent not to change the nature of the land in Adangal, 1-B and Revenue Records in regarding the petitioners land admeasuring agricultural land of the 1 St petitioner’s land in an extent Ac. 0.81 cents in Sy.No.65 in Vaddamanu Village, Thullur Mandat, Guntur District and the 2 nd petitioner’s land measuring an extent Ac.0.81 cents in Sy.No.65 in Vaddamanu Village, Thullur Mandal, Guntur District and 3'"^ petitioner land measuring an extent Ac.0.81 cents in Sy.No.65 in Vaddamanu Village, Thullur Mandal, Guntur District pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: SMT. MARELLA RADHA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: APHC010201392025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) 0M0 m [3329] THURSDAY ,THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 10594/2025 Between: Kanjula Gayathri Reddy and Others ...PETITIONER{S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.MARELLA RADHA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ...RESPONDENT{S) 2 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 10594/2025 ORDER: 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. 2. Permission as sought for is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. SD/- G HELA NAIDU ASSISTANT^EGISTRAR lOFFieER //TRUE COPY// SEC To. 1. One CC to SMT. MARELLA RADHA, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 3. Three CD Copies sree HIGH COURT DATED:01/05/2025 ORDER WP.No.10594 of 2025 DISMISSING THE W.P. AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS