Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51197 (AP)

KONDEVEETI SEETHARAVAMMA v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/9925/2023 · 2025-11-30

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010192922023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] MONDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 9925/2023 Between: 1. KONDEVEETI SEETHARAVAMMA, W/O LATE SAMABA SIVA RAO, AGE 59 YEARS, RESIDENT OF 5 - 47, NARAYANA NAGARAM, MYLAVARAM, NTR DISTRICT- 521230. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYATH RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, AT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, MYLAVARAM GRAMA PANCHAYAT, MYLAVARAM, NTR DISTRICT. 3. THE MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER, MYLAVARAM, NTR DISTRICT. 4. SK ISMAIL, S/O ABDUL REHMAN, AGE 55 YEARS, RESIDENT OF DOOR NO.4-48, KUMMARI STREET, MYLAVARAM VILLAGE, NTR DISTRICT. 2 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring action of the respondent no.2 in not permitting the petitioner, to reconstruct the compound wall, which is damaged and fall down, within the boundaries of the petitioner's house situated in Plot No.28, Block No-159, Layout No.88/99, Narayana Nagaram, Mylavaram, NTR District - 521230. whir-) is arbitrary, against the PrinniplPs of natural justice and violation of Article 14, 19, 21 and 300A of Constitution of India and Section 98, 121 of the Andhra Pradesh Panchayath Raj Act, 1994 and consequently direct the respondent no.2 to grant permission to reconstruction the compound wall, within the boundaries of the petitioner and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondent no.2 to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 12.04.2023 for the reconstruction of the compound wall. till pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to vacate interim order dt.2.5.2023 passed in WP No. 9925 of 2023 pending disposal of above writ petition, in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. BANKA NAGESWARA RAO 3 Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV 3. N SRIHARI (Standing Counsel for ZPP MPP and GRAM PANCHAYAT) The Court made the following ORDER: Sri Banka Nageswara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and that it has become infructuous. Hence, nothing further remains for adjudication. Recording the said submissions, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications pending, if any in the Writ Petition, shall also stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 01.12.2025 ANS 4 144 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 9925/2023 Date: 01.12.2025 ANS