Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51193 (AP)

A Appala Swamy Dora, v. Dr.Shankhabrata Bagchi,

CC/775/2025 · 2025-11-21

Subba Reddy Satti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010138822025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] SATURDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 775/2025 Between: 1. A APPALA SWAMY DORA,, S/O. NAGANNA, AGED ABOUT- 60 YEARS, W/AS HC (2199), STEEL PLANT CRIME P.S.VISAKHAPATNAM CITY, VISAKHAPATNAM DIST. ...PETITIONER AND 1. DR SHANKHABRATA BAGCHI, S/O AND AGE NOT KNOWN, W/AS COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY, VISAKHAPATNAM, AP. 2. SRI HARLSH KUMAR GUPTA, S/O AND AGE NOT KNOWN, W/AS DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, AP, AT MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. SRI KUMAR VISHWAJEET, S/O AND AGE NOT KNOWN, W/AS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT GOVT, OF AP SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATH. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to punish the Respondents for deliberately and willfully disobeying the interim orders passed by this Honble court in IA.No.1 of 2024 in WP.No.20989/2024,dt- 24-09-2024 by his Lordship Justice Subba Reddy Satti.J under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G SEENA KUMAR Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. G RAJU 2. Y V ANIL KUMAR The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: The above contempt case is filed complaining about the non- implementation of the order dated 24.09.2024 passed in I.A.No.1 of 2024 in W.P.No.20989 of 2024. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the order dated 24.09.2024 passed in I.A.No.1 of 2024 in W.P.No.20989 of 2024 has been complied with and no further adjudication is required in the contempt case. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 22.11.2025 TVN 49 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE No.775 OF 2025 Date: 22.11.2025 TVN