APHC010589132025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] FRIDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 30635/2025 Between: 1. MATLA BHULAKSHMI, D/O. SOMIREDDY, AGED 48 YRS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. MAREDUMILLI VILLAGE MANDAL, ALLURI SEETHARAMARAJU DISTRICT. 2. 2. MATLA GOWRI DEVI,, D/O. LATE SOMIREDDY, AGED 41 YRS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. MAREDIMULLI VILLAGE MANDAL, ALLURI SEETHARAMARAJU DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, A THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ALLURI SITHA RAMA RAJU DISTRICT AT PADERU. 3. 3. THE SUBCOLLECTOR AND SETTLEMENT OFFICER, RAMPACHODAVARAM, ALLURI SITHA RAMA RAJU DISTRICT. 4. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, MAREDUMULLIMANDAL, ALLURI SITHA RAMA RAJU DISTRICT. 5. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR, 5. TRIBAL WELFARE, RAMPACHODAVARAM, ALLURI SITHA RAMA RAJU DISTRICT. 6 6. THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER, RAMPACHODAVARAM DIVISION, ALLURI SITHA RAMA RAJU DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS declaring the action of the 3RD respondent in not disposing of the settlement case No. 1 of 2024 filed under the provisions of the The Andhra Pradesh Muttas (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Regulation, 1969 and consequently direct the respondent to consider and dispose of the settlement case No. 1 of 2024 and also direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioners from the land of an extent of Ac. 1.95 cts in Sy. NO. 34 / 6 situated at Maredumilli village, Alluri Seetha Ramaraju district and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased leased to direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from the land an extent of Ac. 1.95 cts in Sy. NO. 34 / 6 situated at Maredumilli Alluri Seetha Ramaraju district and over village, maypass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. K VENKATESH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 30635 of 2025 ORDER: Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri K.Venkatesh, learned counsel for the petitioners, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition with a liberty to file an appropriate writ petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to the petitioners to file an appropriate writ petition. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall also stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH Dt:07.11.2025 SJ 4 116 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D. RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 30635 of 2025 07.11.2025 ssjj