Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51185 (ORI)

RAKESH KUMAR POLAI v. DIBYA JYOTI PARIDA, COLLECTOR,GANJAM

CONTC/5883/2024 · 2025-02-21

Aditya Kumar Mohapatra

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page 1 of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CONTC No.5883 of 2024 Rakesh Kumar Polai ..... Petitioner Represented By Adv. - Alok Kumar Panda -versus- Dibya Jyoti Parida, Collector, Ganjam ..... Opposite Parties Represented By Adv. – A. Pati, A.S.C. CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA ORDER 21.02.2025 Order No. 01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode). 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner. 3. This Contempt Petition is filed alleging non-implementation of the Court’s order dated 21.08.2023 passed in W.P.(C) No.21230 of 2023. 4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner contended that although the order dated 21.08.2023 was duly communicated vide acknowledgment under Annexure-2 to the contempt application. However, same has not been implemented. As such, it is alleged that the conduct of the Opposite Party-Contemnor is construed as an act of wilful and deliberate violation of this Court’s direction. 5. Learned counsel for the Contemnor on the other hand sought Page 2 of 2. for some time to implement the order passed by this court. He further contended that the Contemnor-Opposite Party is likely to take a policy decision with regard to the subject matter involved in the connected writ application. 6. Considering the request made by the learned counsel for the Contemnor, this Court deems it proper to provide another opportunity as a last chance and the Contempt Petition stands disposed of with a direction to the Opposite Party-Contemnor to comply with the direction of this Court dated 21.08.2023 passed in W.P.(C) No.21230 of 2023, if the same has attained finality in the meantime, within a period of eight weeks from the date of service of a certified copy of this order by the Petitioner, provided the operation of order has not been stayed by higher forum and file compliance report before the Registry of this Court within one week thereafter. It is made clear that in the event the order of the Court is not given effect to within the time stipulated hereinabove, it will be construed to be wilful and deliberate violation of this Court’s order. 7. The CONTC is accordingly disposed of. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application. ( A.K. Mohapatra ) Judge Anil