1 / 3 2025:CGHC:51066 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5366 of 2025 Naresh Kumar Gaikwad S/o. Vaman Rao Gaikwad, Aged About 69 Years R/o Pratap Talkies Chowk, Chatapara, Tilaknagar, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Secretary, Department of Revenue, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Collector Korba, District Korba (C.G.) 3 - Tahsildar Korba, District Korba (C.G.) 4 - Patwari Korba, District Korba (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Ravi Kumar Bhagat, Advocate For State : Ms. Akanksha Verma Dabhadker, PL (Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma) Order on Board 14/10/2025 1. The instant petition has been filed for challenging the action of the respondents whereby they are not correcting rectifying the land records for Khasra No.8561, situated at Halka No.16, Tahsil Korba, District Korba pursuant to the order dated 20/01/2016 passed in S.A. No.246/2001. ASHUTOSH MISHRA Digitally signed by ASHUTOSH MISHRA Date: 2025.10.15 18:40:00 +0530 2 / 3 2. The brief facts of the case as projected by the petitioner is that the plaintiff-Benjamin has filed suit for declaration, injunction and possession on the disputed land i.e. Khasra No.856/1 in Civil Suit No.29-A/1994, wherein the Civil Judge Class-I, Korba, has dismissed the suit on 17/01/1996. The said decree was challenged in First Civil Appeal No.5/A/1996 wherein the Additional District Judge, Korba reversed the judgment and decree of the trial Court and suit of the plaintiffs/respondents was decreed in their favour by judgment and decree dated 28/03/2001. Thereafter, the petitioner/defendant challenged the judgment and decree dated 26/03/2001 before this Court in SA No.246/2001, which has been allowed and the judgment and decree dated 28/03/2001 has been set aside. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would contend that after the judgment passed by this Court, the petitioner made many written applications for correction in revenue records of Khasra No.856/1 before the concerned Tehsildar and Patwari Korba and on 27/06/2023 the petitioner has filed an application before the Collector Korba, however, till date the revenue records have not been corrected. He would therefore pray that the suitable directions may be issued to the concerned revenue authorities to correct the revenue records. 4. Per contra, learned State counsel opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 3 / 3 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents. 6. For correction of revenue records, the petitioner should have filed an application under Section 110 of the C.G. Land Revenue Code, 1959 instead of filing a representation. Therefore, the petitioner would be at liberty to move appropriate application under Section 110 of the C.G. Land Revenue Code, 1959 before the concerned Tehsildar, if so desire, and on such application being filed, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law on its own merits. 7. Accordingly, the petitioner is disposed of the with the above observation. SD/- SD/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) JUDGE ashu