1 2025:CGHC:51077 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5388 of 2025 • Shukwara Bai W/o Late Ram Khilawan Sahu Aged About 35 Years R/o Village Kikirada, P.S. Birra, Tahsil Jaijaipur, District Sakti (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Mantralaya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 -Collector Sakti, District Sakti Chhattisgarh 3 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Sakti District Sakti Chhattisgarh 4 - Tahsildar Tahsil Jaijaipur, District Sakti Chhattisgarh 5 - District Treasury Officer Sakti, District Sakti Chhattisgarh 6 - Station House Officer Police Station Birra, District Sakti Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner : Mr. Chandresen Chouhan, Advocate. For Respondent-State : Mr. Rishab Bisen, PL ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order on Board 14.10.2025 2 1. This writ petition has been preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking following reliefs: “RELIEF(S) SOUGHT: (i) That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities consider the representation and to grant compensation amount of Rs. 2,00,000/- as per notification dated 25.02.2022, with interest from date of incident, within stipulated time, in the interest of justice. (ii) Any other relief which may be suitable in the facts and circumstances of the case, may also be granted, in the interest of justice.” 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner contended that this writ petition may be disposed of with a direction to the concerned respondent-authority to consider and decide the pending representation Annexure P-1, within an specified time frame in accordance with law/rules. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents/State submits that he is having no objection to the limited prayer made by counsel for the petitioner. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 5. Considering facts of the case, nature of relief, submissions of counsel for the parties, this writ petition is disposed of at this stage directing the respondent/Tahsildar to consider and decide the pending representation of the petitioner Annexure P-1 in accordance with relevant rule/law/regulation preferably within an 3 outer limit of ‘90 days’ from the date of receipt of this order. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge J/-