BANSI LAL v. SHAZAD AZEEM REGISTRAR GENERAL JAMMU AND ANOTHER
CCP(D)/60/2024 · 2025-03-18
Puneet Gupta, Sanjeev Kumar
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5118 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5118 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CCP (D) No. 60/2024
Bansi Lal .....Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through :- Mr. Vikram Rathore, Advocate
v/s Shazad Azeem, Registrar General Jammu & Anr. .....Respondent(s)
Through :- Mr. Rajnish Raina, Advocate
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PUNEET GUPTA, JUDGE
ORDER 18.03.2025
1. This is a petition for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondents for their willful disobedience and non-compliance of
order dated 09.11.2023 passed by this Court in SWP No. 1944/2018, whereby the Registrar General, J & K High Court, Jammu was directed to treat the writ petition as representation and take a decision thereon on the basis of averments made therein, within a period of six weeks from the date, copy of the order (supra) was made available to him, strictly under rules.
2. The respondent has filed status report along with copy of Order No. 144 of 2025/Psy dated 04.02.2025, a perusal whereof indicates that the matter has been considered in terms of the judgment passed by this Court and the same has been found devoid of merit and thus rejected. In that view of the matter, there is no justification or reason to continue with the contempt proceedings, as the judgment passed by this Court stands complied with.
Sr. No. 07
2
CCP No. 60/2024
3. Resultantly, the proceedings in the contempt petition are closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedy against the
order of consideration in accordance with law.
(Puneet Gupta) (Sanjeev Kumar) Judge Judge
JAMMU 18.03.2025 Manan